1984
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(84)90006-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of muscle reattachment following surgical detachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The effects of muscle reattachment comprise new bone formation to envelop the reorganizing tendon. 12 Similar fi ndings were observed after transposition of the masseter muscle. 26 Contour alterations of the angular process in the removal group were another important fi nding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 The effects of muscle reattachment comprise new bone formation to envelop the reorganizing tendon. 12 Similar fi ndings were observed after transposition of the masseter muscle. 26 Contour alterations of the angular process in the removal group were another important fi nding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The reattachment process includes superfi cial new bone formation. 12 Experimental alterations of the masseter muscle length can change the gonial region. 13 However, the role of the musculature in the process of bone formation is not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This temporary reduction of FHP-ABM angle may be related with the process of muscle reattachment which initially occurs at the center of the muscle and then develops toward the end of muscle. 21 In the 48-week animals, the FHP-ABM angle on the ostectomized side reached a nearly normal level. This process indicated that, although the reattachment site of the masseter muscle was relatively moved superiorly after MAO, the orientation of the masseter muscle remained unchanged.…”
Section: Annals Of Plastic Surgery • Volume 63 Number 6 December 2009mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The use of polymers in the medullary canal of the bone implants was indicated with the purpose of increasing their resistance (O'Brien, Straw, & Withrow, 1993;Straw & Withrow, 1995). The polyurethane resin, developed by Chierici and Miller (1984), was used in dogs by Ignácio in 1999 and by Maria (2001), showing to be biocompatible and biotolerant without presenting osseointegration.…”
Section: Bone Allograftsmentioning
confidence: 99%