“…Han et al measured the LLE data for the four mixtures {(TFE + water + dichloromethane), (TFE + water + 2-ethyl-1-hexanol), (TFE + water + n -propyl acetate), and (TFE + water + isopentanol)} at 303.2 K. Among them, the ester n -propyl acetate has higher D and S for TFE than the alcohols and dichloromethane, which is more suitable as an extractant for separating TFE from its aqueous mixture. Lin et al measured the LLE data for the four mixtures {(TFE + water + methyl isopropyl ketone), (TFE + water + methyl isobutyl ketone), (TFE + water + benzyl alcohol), and (TFE + water + 4-methyl-2-pentanol)} recover at 298.2 K. The results revealed that the ketone solvents, especially methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), have much higher D and S for TFE than the alcohols. Based on the results of the literature, it can be inferred that the extractants n -propyl acetate and MIBK can separate fluor-alcohols from azeotropic mixtures with low fluor-alcohol content since esters are more environmentally friendly, less costly, and easier to store compared to ketones. − Therefore, in view of industrial operation and environmental impact, isobutyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and isopropyl acetate were selected as the extractants to extract TFE from the azeotropic mixture with a higher concentration of TFE by LLET.…”