2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-022-02948-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study and Soft Computing Modeling of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Limestone Rocks Considering Dry and Saturation Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two error criteria (i.e., RMSE and MAE) measured the error based on the difference between the expected and predicted SVs and ROC curves were plotted to measure the accuracy. However, there are other indicators (e.g., a20 107 and error level-cumulative frequency plot 108 ) that can be used in the subsequent efforts to support these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two error criteria (i.e., RMSE and MAE) measured the error based on the difference between the expected and predicted SVs and ROC curves were plotted to measure the accuracy. However, there are other indicators (e.g., a20 107 and error level-cumulative frequency plot 108 ) that can be used in the subsequent efforts to support these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, an error analysis is carried out to compare the accuracy of the new EPR-MOGA model with the available equations in the literature. This was done by obtaining and plotting the relationship between the cumulative frequency and error level using the methodology employed by many previous studies (e.g., [11,15,33]. The results are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we were selected the following elements to evaluate the model's performance: the explained variance score (EVS); the mean squared error (MSE); the mean absolute error (MAE); the correlation coefficient (R); the ratio of predictions with an error within the range of ±20% of the total predictions (a20-index); and the percentage of prediction within an error range of ±30% (P30) [49][50][51][52][53]. The EVS value range is [0, 1]; the closer this value is to 1, the more the independent variable can explain the observed variance change of the dependent variable.…”
Section: Evaluation and Interpretation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%