2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study and mathematical modeling of toxic metals combined action as a scientific foundation for occupational and environmental health risk assessment. A summary of results obtained by the Ekaterinburg research team (Russia)

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used mathematical modeling for confirming the effect-dependent and dose-dependent ambiguity of the combined binary action typology. Since this experiment is just an additional piece of evidence in support of this fundamental postulate, justified and repeatedly confirmed previously [ 12 , 15 , 17 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], we confine ourselves in this paper to illustrating it with a few examples only. Thus, comparison of Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows that the combination (SiO 2 -NP + TiO 2 -NP) displays subadditivity of unidirectional action for one effect (increase in the concentration of ceruloplasmin in the blood serum) and contra-directional action for another one (increase in AST concentration).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We used mathematical modeling for confirming the effect-dependent and dose-dependent ambiguity of the combined binary action typology. Since this experiment is just an additional piece of evidence in support of this fundamental postulate, justified and repeatedly confirmed previously [ 12 , 15 , 17 , 53 , 54 , 55 ], we confine ourselves in this paper to illustrating it with a few examples only. Thus, comparison of Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows that the combination (SiO 2 -NP + TiO 2 -NP) displays subadditivity of unidirectional action for one effect (increase in the concentration of ceruloplasmin in the blood serum) and contra-directional action for another one (increase in AST concentration).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Generally speaking, we were able to answer this question in the affirmative without reservations. Since all of these works have already been overviewed and illustrated by us in this Journal [ 65 ], it would be inappropriate to do the same here again, and we may restrict ourselves to formulating just the main postulates inferred from our research and illustrate them with a few examples. The widely assumed theoretical paradigms of effect additivity vs dose additivity as essentially different kinds of combined toxicity proved to be, in our experiments, virtually interchangeable and so might be regarded as different methods of combined toxicity modeling rather than as concepts reflecting fundamentally differing processes.…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of the Most Important Inferences From Our Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of combined toxicity pertains to the theoretically most complex and practically important challenges in preventive toxicology [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] ]. Over a number of years, it has been a subject of extensive studies for our research team [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ]. One of the least studied aspects of this problem is the possibility that inorganic toxicants (lead compounds in particular) may have some effect on the biotransformation of organic ones and thus on their toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%