2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.194.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Reinvestigation of Ni-Zr System

Abstract: Phase equilibria in the Ni-Zr system were experimentally reinvestigated by means of differential thermal, electron microprobe, X-Ray diffraction and metallographic analyses of the alloys, which were prepared by arc melting and then annealed at 900°C during 2 weeks. The temperatures of equilibria reactions in Ni-Zr systems were specified and phase diagram Ni-Zr was reconstructed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This new component can be attributed to ZrNi 3 by comparing the results reported from our recent PAC investigations in ZrNi 3[33]. It is known that ZrNi 3 was formed by the peritectoid reaction (Zr 2 Ni 7 +Zr 8 Ni 21 →ZrNi 3 ) at 1193 K[20] and at 1261 K[21].The predominant phase due to ZrNi (63%) is found to be produced here which was first observed at 973 K in the sample. Appearance of ZrNi as a secondary phase in the synthesized Zr 9…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This new component can be attributed to ZrNi 3 by comparing the results reported from our recent PAC investigations in ZrNi 3[33]. It is known that ZrNi 3 was formed by the peritectoid reaction (Zr 2 Ni 7 +Zr 8 Ni 21 →ZrNi 3 ) at 1193 K[20] and at 1261 K[21].The predominant phase due to ZrNi (63%) is found to be produced here which was first observed at 973 K in the sample. Appearance of ZrNi as a secondary phase in the synthesized Zr 9…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The theoretically optimized structure parameters together with the experimental values obtained from earlier [16,21] and present X-ray diffraction measurements are shown in Table 3. We can see that a lattice constants overestimate the experimental ones for about 1%, while the c lattice constants underestimate the measured ones for about 2%.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations