2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.094802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Observation of “Shadowing” in Optical Transition Radiation

Abstract: We report the observation of shadowing between two optical transition radiation (OTR) sources from a 205 MeV electron beam. The total optical intensity is measured as a function of the distance d between the sources, covering the range 0 < d < 4L v , where L v is the formation length of the particles. Data show that the total optical intensity starts decreasing due to shadowing when d approaches L v until it becomes undetectable for very short distances d/L v → 0. A model based solely on interference between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between the mask and the target ("dist") is 123 mm. Considering the wavelength (λ) observed during the experiment, this distance represents a fraction of the radiation formation zone (L f = γ 2 λ/2π ); in particular, dist ≈ 0.3L f for λ = 400 nm and dist ≈ 0.48L f for λ = 250 nm [18,26], meaning that interference between the diffraction radiation produced from the mask and from the target must be taken into account in the analysis, as shown in Ref. [18].…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between the mask and the target ("dist") is 123 mm. Considering the wavelength (λ) observed during the experiment, this distance represents a fraction of the radiation formation zone (L f = γ 2 λ/2π ); in particular, dist ≈ 0.3L f for λ = 400 nm and dist ≈ 0.48L f for λ = 250 nm [18,26], meaning that interference between the diffraction radiation produced from the mask and from the target must be taken into account in the analysis, as shown in Ref. [18].…”
Section: A Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%