1971
DOI: 10.1177/00220345710500042801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Model for the Study of Osteogenesis and Remodeling

Abstract: The experimental model in this study yielded a consistent pattern of normal healing. Thus, it is useful in studies of the effects of various extrinsic and intrinsic factors on osteogenesis and remodeling. Incorporation of the callus with the cortex appeared to involve the creation of new osteon formed partly by the callus and partly by the original bone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, it was emphasized that the bone defect that should be created in experimental animal models should not be less than the critical size, that the defect should include both cortical and cancellous bone, and that the defect areas should be kept at an appropriate distance so that the biomaterials used do not affect each other. In the study, it was observed that the size of the critical defect in the tibia bone was determined as '>5 mm′ in the sample studies [ [28] , [29] , [30] ]. In line with this information, standardized defects of 6 mm diameter and 5 mm depth were created in the right and left tibia bones of each animal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, it was emphasized that the bone defect that should be created in experimental animal models should not be less than the critical size, that the defect should include both cortical and cancellous bone, and that the defect areas should be kept at an appropriate distance so that the biomaterials used do not affect each other. In the study, it was observed that the size of the critical defect in the tibia bone was determined as '>5 mm′ in the sample studies [ [28] , [29] , [30] ]. In line with this information, standardized defects of 6 mm diameter and 5 mm depth were created in the right and left tibia bones of each animal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the amount of healing and so, the CSD determination could be attributed to several factors, including the species and strains of the animals utilized along with the anatomic location, 28 defect size, 29 periosteum intactness, 30 dura matter, 31 and animal age 18 . In this study, all factors have been standardized to highlight the effect of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Peacock and Winkle, 1970). Ορισμένοι συγγραφείς παρόλαυτά υποστηρίζουν ,ότι αποδό μηση οστού είναι δυνατόν να γίνει και χωρίς την παρουσία κυττά-, ρων που μορφολογικά να αναγνωρίζονται σαν οστεοκλάστες (Belanger and Vincent 1963, Henrikson 1968, Najjar and Kahn 1971.…”
Section: οιunclassified