Experimental Investigation on the Basic Law of the Fracture Spatial Morphology for Water Pressure Blasting in a Drillhole Under True Triaxial Stress

Abstract

The present literature on the morphology of water pressure blasting fractures in drillholes is not sufficient and does not take triaxial confining stress into account. Because the spatial morphology of water pressure blasting fractures in drillholes is not clear, the operations lack an exact basis. Using a large true triaxial water pressure blasting experimental system and an acoustic emission 3-D positioning system, water pressure blasting experiments on cement mortar test blocks (300 mm 9 300 mm 9 300 mm) were conducted to study the associated basic law of the fracture spatial morphology. The experimental results show that water pressure blasting does not always generate bubble pulsation. After water pressure blasting under true triaxial stress, a crushed compressive zone and a blasting fracture zone are formed from the inside, with the blasting section of the naked drillhole as the center, to the outside. The shape of the outer edges of the two zones is ellipsoidal. The range of the blasting fracture is large in the radial direction of the drillhole, where the surrounding pressure is large, i.e., the range of the blasting fracture in the drillhole radial cross-section is approximately ellipsoidal. The rock near the drillhole wall is affected by a tensile stress wave caused by the test block boundary reflection, resulting in more flake fractures appearing in the fracturing crack surface in the drillhole axial direction and parallel to the boundary surface. The flake fracture is thin, presenting a small-range flake fracture. The spatial morphology of the water pressure blasting fracture in the drillhole along the axial direction is similar to a wide-mouth Chinese bottle: the crack extent is large near the drillhole orifice, gradually narrows inward along the drillhole axial direction, and then increases into an approximate ellipsoid in the internal naked blasting section. Based on the causes of the crack generation, the blasting cracks are divided into three zones: the blasting shock zone, the axial extension zone, and the orifice influence zone. The explosion shock zone is the range that is directly impacted by the explosive shock waves. The axial extension zone is the axial crack area with uniform width, which is formed when the blasting fracture in the edge of the explosion shock zone extends along the drillhole wall. The extension of the orifice influence zone is very large because the explosion stress waves reflect at the free face and generate tensile stress waves. In the water pressure blasting of the drillhole, the sealing section should be lengthened to allow the drillhole blasting cracks to extend sufficiently under the long-time effect of the blasting stress field of quasi-hydrostatic pressure.

CT Identification and Fractal Characterization of 3‐D Propagation and Distribution of Hydrofracturing Cracks in Low‐Permeability Heterogeneous Rocks

“…Experimental investigation provides a way to reveal the hydrofracturing crack morphology under complex lithology and stress conditions. The acoustic emission (AE) method is effective for locating fracture events (Chen et al, , ; Huang et al, ; Huang & Li, ; Stanchits et al, ; Wasantha et al, ). However, it is difficult to acquire accurate crack morphology from AE data.…”

Experimental Study of Coal Pyrolysis under the Simulated High-Temperature and High-Stress Conditions of Underground Coal Gasification

“…6−8 The resources that are buried deep underground are inaccessible for traditional mining methods. 9,10 However, these kinds of resources can be utilized by UCG. Therefore, UCG is an efficient method for directly converting deep coal resources into clean energy 11 and reducing carbon emissions.…”

Experimental Study on the Effect of Coal Particle Size on the Mechanics, Pore Structure, and Permeability of Coal-like Materials for Low-Rank Coalbed Methane Reservoir Simulation

“…The action mechanism of various reservoir stimulation technologies can be well understood through large-scale physical simulation experiments in the laboratory. Scholars have carried out much research to study the fracturing behaviors of high-rank coal reservoirs. , However, the larger-size raw coal (especially low-rank coal) can be second-damaged (weathering and rupture) in the transportation and preparation processes (drilling, cutting, and grinding), causing large dispersion of test results. − Coal-like materials, usually composed of pulverized coal, cement, gypsum, and sand, are similar to raw coal in physical properties. They have been widely used to replace raw coal to study fracturing and permeability enhancement technologies of CBM reservoirs. ,− …”