2013
DOI: 10.4050/jahs.58.012005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Stall Performance for the EDI-M109 and EDI-M112 Airfoils

Abstract: An experimental investigation of the dynamic performance of two new rotor blade airfoils was undertaken in a transonic wind tunnel. The EDI-M109 and EDI-M112 airfoils were tested at 0.3 ≤ M ≤ 0.5 for pitching motions with amplitude 0.5 • ≤ α ± ≤ 8 • and frequencies 3.3 Hz ≤ f ≤ 45 Hz. The results show the dynamic stall performance of both new airfoils, and the effect of frequency, amplitude, and higher order pitching motion on these results is described. The pitching moment peak size was found to have an appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental airloads coefficients are not corrected by the wind tunnel effects because well-established correction methods are not available for pitching airfoils tests, in particular for pitching cycles with highoscillation amplitudes. The standard deviation of the airloads coefficients are plotted on the experimental curves, as shown in the recent works by Gardner et al 18,23 The evaluation of the airloads standard deviation allows to evaluate the aperiodicity of the flow during the collected pitching cycles. In particular, the small values observed during the upstroke motion suggest the quite periodic behaviour of the flow during this phase of the motion.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental airloads coefficients are not corrected by the wind tunnel effects because well-established correction methods are not available for pitching airfoils tests, in particular for pitching cycles with highoscillation amplitudes. The standard deviation of the airloads coefficients are plotted on the experimental curves, as shown in the recent works by Gardner et al 18,23 The evaluation of the airloads standard deviation allows to evaluate the aperiodicity of the flow during the collected pitching cycles. In particular, the small values observed during the upstroke motion suggest the quite periodic behaviour of the flow during this phase of the motion.…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wall boundary layer suction system was considered quite complex to be implemented together with an oscillating airfoil system; indeed, the known reference experimental activities about dynamic stall on pitching airfoils were carried out without suction. 12,[17][18][19] The driving mechanism is composed of a brushless servomotor and a 12:1 gear drive shaft. Two encoders are directly mounted on the external shaft on the other side of the model with respect to the motor: a 2048 imp/rev absolute digital encoder is used for feedback control and a 4096 imp/rev incremental analogue encoder is used to get the instantaneous position of the model.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twodimensional rotor blade airfoil model EDI-M109 was used (Gardner et al 2013a) and is built using the same footprint as the DSA-9A airfoil in the preceding section and installed in the DNW-TWG, as further described by Richter et al (2014).…”
Section: Transition Detection For the Pitching Edi-m109 Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many wind tunnel models are already equipped with surface pressure measurement, the method may require no additional instrumentation. The effect described in this paper has been used by the authors to describe the transition movement of periodically pitching helicopter airfoils experiencing dynamic stall in Gardner et al (2013a) and Richter et al (2013), although the systematic comparison against other transition measurement methods was not applied at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A further comparison between the two airfoils for the DS2 test case based on the wind tunnel measurements is given in Ref. 9. Three-dimensional and particularly wind tunnel sidewall effects were considered the main reasons for the overestimation of the vortex magnitudes in the 2D calculations.…”
Section: D Airfoil Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%