Drop tower tests on beam specimens were carried out to evaluate the influence of different geometric features and different loading velocities on the beams' response.Tested geometric characteristics are stirrup reinforcement in addition to longitudinal reinforcement, and notches. The goal is to quantify the differences in the global behavior and the amount of strains and strain rates measured at different positions on the reinforcement. This gives an insight into strain distributions along the rebars from which bond stresses can be derived. It can be stated that stirrup reinforcement kept the specimens together and thus increased the impact resistance. That was seen in the deflection and acceleration measurements, but it was also suggested by strain measurements, especially looking at residual strains. The maximum strains are generally more affected by global bending of the specimens than by the formation of a localized punching cone, which was the main failure mode. K E Y W O R D S beam test, bond stress evaluation, drop tower, high-velocity impact, strain measurement 1 | INTRODUCTION 1.1 | General Damage of structures caused by explosions or impacts is a threat to the structural integrity and therefore also for humans and goods residing within these structures. 1 Different test set-ups help to characterize the material and structural behavior under impact loading. The main set-ups that are used to determine the behavior of reinforced concrete structures under impact loading are split Hopkinson bars for small-scale experiments and drop towers for experiments on a large scale. In split Hopkinson bar experiments, material characteristics can be determined. Different split Hopkinson bar set-ups and results are for example analyzed in subsequent studies. 2-4 On a large observation scale, a lot of different plate experiments were carried out by different researchers. Information on these experiments can be found for example in subsequent studies. 5-8 Besides plate tests, drop tower beam tests were often performed. The failure mode of beams with different geometries and different types of reinforcement was studied by several researchers. In the following, the main findings of different authors with focus on the failure modes are presented. Somraj et al. 9 tested beams with different geometries with the help of a servo-controlled rapid loading machine. The beams' spans were 1000 mm and 1400 mm. The beams had varying shear span to depth ratios-which is the distance between the support force and the load introduction point compared to the inner lever arm of the longitudinal reinforcement-and different stirrup reinforcement ratios.The loading rates, defined as deflection rates, were kept constant during each of the tests. This leads to very long impact durations of up to 20 ms. In addition, the authors placed a steel plate of 40 mm  150 mm between the drop hammer nose and the specimen to introduce the load over the whole width of the beam. The researchers found that beams without shear reinforcement failed more brittle t...