2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

26
253
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
26
253
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second point related to the historical distributions is that common restoration goals for stand structure attributes, particularly canopy cover, tree density, and live tree carbon, in similar forest types are on the upper end of or entirely exceed the values we report in distributions based on the 1911 data ( Fig. 3) (Stephens and Moghaddas 2005, North et al 2007, North et al 2009a. If the treatments carried out in these studies are representative of restoration treatments throughout the Sierra Nevada region and restoration of historical forest conditions is a goal, this suggests that contemporary treatment prescriptions may be too conservative with respect to residual stand structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The second point related to the historical distributions is that common restoration goals for stand structure attributes, particularly canopy cover, tree density, and live tree carbon, in similar forest types are on the upper end of or entirely exceed the values we report in distributions based on the 1911 data ( Fig. 3) (Stephens and Moghaddas 2005, North et al 2007, North et al 2009a. If the treatments carried out in these studies are representative of restoration treatments throughout the Sierra Nevada region and restoration of historical forest conditions is a goal, this suggests that contemporary treatment prescriptions may be too conservative with respect to residual stand structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In roaded or otherwise accessible areas, such density reductions might be accomplished by mechanical thinning, prescribed fires, or both (Stephens and Moghaddas 2005b). In remote or rugged terrain, wildland fire use or appropriate management response suppression fire may be the only reasonable option ).…”
Section: Reduce Greenhouse Gasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, low-intensity fires do not have a great impact on the forest structure on a large scale, as they do not signif icantly reduce coarse decayed wood amounts (Stephens and Moghaddas, 2005) , tree or shrub cover (Phillips and Waldrop, 2008) . However, low-intensity fire has smaller scale impacts on environmental variables that could have important effects on the invertebrate community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some authors have found positive effects on both vegetation and soil (Botelho et al, 1994;Molina and Bardají, 1998;Piñol et al, 2005;Úbeda et al, 2005), others have found changes in plant species composition and dominance after the f ire treatment (Baeza and Vallejo, 2008). Despite these contradictory results, there is increasing consensus that prescribed fire will be important in restoring ecosystem processes and reducing fire risk at least in conifer forests (Stephens and Moghaddas, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%