2015
DOI: 10.1051/meca/2015018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental force measurements in single point incremental sheet forming SPIF

Abstract: This paper provides the experimental protocol, of the process of a single point incremental sheet forming "SPIF", allowing predicting the efforts of forming. To speak about parameters of a single point incremental sheet forming (SPIF), we should find the good parameter for judgement. A prediction of the forming force during the SPIF process is selected to ensure the safe use of the tooling and machinery, in particular when using a robot or a milling machine not designed for the process. During the incremental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forming parameters, including tool radius, step size, and feed rate, were customized according to the capability of the designed CNC machine, and Table 2 outlines the control forming parameters chosen for the experiments and their design spaces with various levels. Per the central composite design (CCD) considering the face-centered option (Figure 7b), the 20 sets of the experimental runs were obtained as factorial points (1-8), star points (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and center points (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), as summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Because of the 6 similar center points concerning the central composite face-centered (CCF) design, the responses were averaged from the repetition of the SPIF experiments without altering any test conditions.…”
Section: Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forming parameters, including tool radius, step size, and feed rate, were customized according to the capability of the designed CNC machine, and Table 2 outlines the control forming parameters chosen for the experiments and their design spaces with various levels. Per the central composite design (CCD) considering the face-centered option (Figure 7b), the 20 sets of the experimental runs were obtained as factorial points (1-8), star points (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), and center points (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), as summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Because of the 6 similar center points concerning the central composite face-centered (CCF) design, the responses were averaged from the repetition of the SPIF experiments without altering any test conditions.…”
Section: Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-component FN7325 force sensor was mounted on the work-table to measure the forming forces that occur during the process. This platform was initially developed for the incremental forming of aluminium sheets and was presented in previous paper [2]. This paper concerns the incremental forming of stainless 304L steel sheets which have a size of 200 mm x 200 mm.…”
Section: Experimental Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But its high cost and difficult formability compared with aluminum make that the incremental forming of titanium sheet is little studied. Before the incremental forming process of stainless 304L steel sheets are used is really industrialized, studies are necessary [2][3][4][5][6]. The ISF process indeed suffers from a big slowness, geometrical inaccuracy, a not homogeneous thickness distribution which reduces its industrial suitability [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saidi et al studied the influence of several parameters on the evolution of the axial forming force during the incremental forming of a truncated cone. They were able to optimize the process with respect to the most influent parameters [25]. In previous studies by the authors, it was shown that predicted forces are affected by the choice of yield functions [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%