2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental examination of heat removal limitation of screw cooling tube at high pressure and temperature conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ezato et al [14] evaluated the CHFs of an M10 screw tube with a 1.5 mm pitch at pressure, inert bulk temperature, and flow velocity ranges of 2-4 MPa, 30 • C-100 • C, and 2.2-19.5 m s −1 , respectively. They reported that the forced convection heat transfer coefficient (HTC) performance of the screw tube in the SP regime was twice as good as that of a plain tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ezato et al [14] evaluated the CHFs of an M10 screw tube with a 1.5 mm pitch at pressure, inert bulk temperature, and flow velocity ranges of 2-4 MPa, 30 • C-100 • C, and 2.2-19.5 m s −1 , respectively. They reported that the forced convection heat transfer coefficient (HTC) performance of the screw tube in the SP regime was twice as good as that of a plain tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raffray [5] studied the effects of armour thickness of a carbon-fibre composite (CFC) monoblock on its peaking factors, but the effects of flow parameters on peaking factors were not considered in their papers. Ezato [6,8] proposed that the peaking factor of an oxygen-free high-conductivity copper (OFHC-Cu) screw tube varies from 1.39 to 1.70 depending on the coolant pressure, velocity and temperature, but the details of influence rules were not given. J. Boscary [9] gave the peaking factors of nine different tubes and the results showed that there were significant differences of peaking factors between different structures or different materials of tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, numerical simulation becomes an effective way of research on subcooled boiling heat transfer characteristics of the water-cooled W/Cu divertor. Koichiro [6] , Araki [7] and Boscary [8] calculated the temperature distribution of the water-cooled divertor by assuming the local heat transfer coefficients (HTC) of the cooling wall to be functions of local wall temperature or heat flux, and only the heat conduction in solid was calculated. The important parameters that were related to subcooled boiling, such as void fraction, were not obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%