2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of the wind-induced bias of precipitation gauges using particle image velocimetry and particle tracking in the wind tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the environmental sources of bias, wind is the most relevant one [2], causing the so-called exposure effect [3]. The gauge body, immersed in a wind field, behaves like a bluff-body obstacle to the undisturbed airflow, producing strong velocity gradients, vertical components, and the development of turbulence close to the gauge surface, see, e.g., [4,5]. The hydrometeor trajectories are diverted by the velocity field around the instrument [6] depending on their diameter, the gauge shape, wind speed, and wind direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the environmental sources of bias, wind is the most relevant one [2], causing the so-called exposure effect [3]. The gauge body, immersed in a wind field, behaves like a bluff-body obstacle to the undisturbed airflow, producing strong velocity gradients, vertical components, and the development of turbulence close to the gauge surface, see, e.g., [4,5]. The hydrometeor trajectories are diverted by the velocity field around the instrument [6] depending on their diameter, the gauge shape, wind speed, and wind direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the precipitation measured by three calibrated tipping-bucket rain gauges with the actual rainfall depths, Shedekar et al (2016) found that the values measured by the three devices were significantly smaller, particularly for heavy rainfall. When it was windy, some raindrops (especially smaller ones) often missed the funnel or fell at an inclination because of wind-induced flow deflection, eddies, and turbulence around the gauges (Kochendorfer et al, 2017;Pollock et al, 2018;Cauteruccio et al, 2020;Colli et al, 2020). Finally, the catch efficiency of the gauge was biased from the real value, which was usually referred to as the wind-induced under-catch effect.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations have provided valuable information for the theoretical understanding and improvement of the IMERG algorithm and its practical applications (Tang et al, 2016;2018;Ma et al, 2020;Saouabe et al, 2020;Caloiero et al, 2021). However, there are still several gaps in the current evaluation of IMERG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the gauge outer geometry on the aerodynamic behaviour of the gauge was investigated by Colli et al (2018), by simulating four different geometries: cylindrical, chimney, and two different inverted conical shapes. The CFD velocity fields, obtained within a Reynolds Average Navier Stokes (RANS) modelling approach, revealed that gauges with inverted conical shape have better aerodynamic behaviour than the chimney shaped gauge, while the cylindrical gauge had and intermediate behaviour (see also Cauteruccio et al, 2021b). The cylindrical shape is typical of most tipping-bucket rain gauges that are employed operationally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%