1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01385032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of gender effects in arbitration decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has examined the effect of gender on outcomes in other arbitral and judicial settings. Bemels, in an analysis of 104 grievance arbitration cases, found that women were twice as likely as men to have their grievance sustained (Bemels ); in a later study of over 1800 discharge cases, Bemels found that in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men, but there was no significant difference in the treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators (Bemels ; see also Bemels ; Oswald and Caudill ). Scott and Shadoan analyzed 169 grievance arbitration awards and found that the gender of the grievant and the gender of the arbitrator had no effect on these decisions (Scott and Shadoan ).…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has examined the effect of gender on outcomes in other arbitral and judicial settings. Bemels, in an analysis of 104 grievance arbitration cases, found that women were twice as likely as men to have their grievance sustained (Bemels ); in a later study of over 1800 discharge cases, Bemels found that in cases decided by male arbitrators women were 86 percent more likely to have their grievances sustained than were men, but there was no significant difference in the treatment of male and female grievants by female arbitrators (Bemels ; see also Bemels ; Oswald and Caudill ). Scott and Shadoan analyzed 169 grievance arbitration awards and found that the gender of the grievant and the gender of the arbitrator had no effect on these decisions (Scott and Shadoan ).…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we separate the effects of grievant gender on arbitration decisions for male arbitrators from female arbitrators, the research suggests that female arbitrators treat male and female grievants similarly, and male arbitrators have a slight tendency to treat female grievants more favorably. In studies examining female arbitrators, Bigoness and DuBose (1985), Bemmels (1988c), Scott and Shadoan (1989) and Oswald and Caudill (1991) all found no difference in the treatment of male and female grievants. These studies go against the Queen Bee syndrome (Staines et al 1974) which suggests that women in positions of authority place extremely high expectations on other women.…”
Section: Sexual Harassment Complaints and Decision Maker Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These studies go against the Queen Bee syndrome (Staines et al 1974) which suggests that women in positions of authority place extremely high expectations on other women. In studies of male arbitrators, some researchers (e.g., Bigoness and Dubose 1985;Bemmels 1988b;Oswald and Caudill 1991;Tata 1990) found no differences between the treatment of male and female grievants by male arbitrators. Bemmels (1988a, c), however, did find that male arbitrators treated female grievants more favorably than male grievants.…”
Section: Sexual Harassment Complaints and Decision Maker Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nonprofessional employees comprise 58.8% of our sample. Despite numerous studies concluding that case outcomes are related to occupational differences, this hypothesis was not supported by our data. Case outcomes in terms of a vacatur of an award or a finding in favor of management are positively related to the male sex of the individual as suggested by (Bemmels (1988a, 1988b); Biernat and Malin (2008); and Oswald and Caudill (1991). One problem in this hypothesis is that in the court cases the identity of the individual was not always disclosed.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research showing occupational differences in the arbitration process has included differences in the occupations themselves (Lewin, 1990; Thornicroft, 1989, 1992); differences related to teachers (Clark & Ogata, 2006; Marmo, 1986); IRS agents (Guffey & Helms, 2001); police, law enforcement and firefighters (Johnson, McKenzie, & Crawley, 2007; LaVan & Carley, 1985; LaVan (2007b); LaVan, Katz, & Carley, 1993); and nurses or nurse practitioners (Philipsen, 2008; Turner, 2009). Sex differences may also occur, owing to sex segregation in various occupations (Bemmels (1988a, 1988b); Biernat & Malin, 2008; Oswald & Caudill, 1991).…”
Section: Case Characteristics Related To Case Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%