A two-fold mass spectrometer study of the A1 + H 2 0 reactions in effusion cells and in atmospheric H z + O t flames was conducted. The flame studies yielded a Dg of 119.5 f5 kcal/mole for A10, in agreement with the results of previous thermochemical and spectroscopic investigations. A discussion concerning the discrepancy between the data obtained in these and previous flame experiments is presented. The major Al-0-H species in both the effusion and the flame studies was NOH, with a AHfZ9* of -42.7+2 kcal/mole. The flame studies also produced other suboxides of aluminum, as well as the species A102H, for which a AHf298 of -90+ 5 kcal/mole was obtained.Considerable controversy has existed for several years concerning the high temperature chemistry and thermodynamics of reactions involving Al and H20. Widely discrepant data have been reported by various investigators. For example, the dissociation energy of A10 obtained from effusion experiments has differed by as much as 100 kJ from the results of recent spectroscopic measurements of aluminium additives in flames. The identity of the major Al-0-H flame species, as well as their thermodynamics, has also been in dispute.A wide discrepancy exists regarding the results of two groups of experiments :(1) Knudsen effusion, Langmuir evaporation, transpiration, spectroscopic and mass spectrometric ; and (2) combustion and flame spectroscopy.6-8 Concerning the dissociation energy of AlO, the controversy involves an A10 bond energy differing by a maximum of only 5 or 6 kcal among the various types of experiments in group (l), which in turn differ by as much as 20 kcal with those of group (2).Gurvich and Veyts were among the early workers who examined the behaviour of aluminum in flames. Recently, papers by Jensen and Jones and Newman and Page reported results of studies of aluminum additives to H2 + N2 + O2 flames.Jensen and Jones obtained -5+ 10 kcal for AHfZ9&lO, which is in agreement with the second and third law D; values of 601 & 34 kJ and 5 8 9 2 75 kJ, respectively, reported by Newman and Page.These three papers 6-8 recommend a value for the heat of formation of A10 which is 20 kcal more negative than the spectroscopic value of 16.57 kcal/mole obtained by Tyte and MacDonald and Innes (DZ = 506 kJ/mol), and the value of 17.0 kcal/ mole obtained by Farber et aZ.,3 in an effusion-mass spectrometer study under neutral conditions of the vapour species over alumina in the temperature range 1943-2093 K. Gole and Zare recently studied the visible chemiluminescence in a cross-beam experiment involving a thermal beam of aluminium atoms, -1700 K, intersecting an uncollimated beam of ozone molecules, 300K, and reported a minimum value of 17.6 kcal/mole for AHf298A10. In carrying out a rotational analysis of two emission bands found near 2500 and 2800 A, MacDonald and Innes deduced that the observed spectra corresponded to emission from two highly-excited states of A10 to a common 1962,127,1674. (Dow Chemical Co.
JANAF ThermochemicaE Tables