2019
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2019.1626878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental detergent drying analysis in a counter-current spray dryer with swirling air flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During the injection of glass beads, detergent could be seen in the powder recovered at the bottom. This is in line with the study of fouling that points out the importance of the breakage of deposit structures 12,43 and its effects on the overall solid RTD in a counter current swirl dryer under full operation. The particles can deposit in the wall an average time, in the order of 700−800 s, before being removed back into the flow.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…During the injection of glass beads, detergent could be seen in the powder recovered at the bottom. This is in line with the study of fouling that points out the importance of the breakage of deposit structures 12,43 and its effects on the overall solid RTD in a counter current swirl dryer under full operation. The particles can deposit in the wall an average time, in the order of 700−800 s, before being removed back into the flow.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, in the counter-current configuration, droplets are sprayed from the opposite side to the airflow. The relatively high slip velocities of particles result in high heat and mass transfer, and therefore, these dryers are considered to have higher throughput and thermal efficiencies than co-current spray dryers [4,5]. This configuration is primarily suitable for thermally stable materials such as detergents [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being a mature technology, conventional dryers suffer from major challenges, such as large equipment size and high operational and maintenance costs. While counter-current dryers are thermally more efficient and require lesser energy input, owing to bigger temperature gradients between droplets and the air, than the co-current dryers [5,6], they are limited to thermally resistant materials such as detergents [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%