2017 15th International Conference on Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems (ELMA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/elma.2017.7955453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental design of stand-alone field oriented control for WECS in variable speed DFIG-based on hysteresis current controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regulation of the active and reactive powers in decoupled form with the DFIG is regulated using the field-oriented control (FOC) technique [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulation of the active and reactive powers in decoupled form with the DFIG is regulated using the field-oriented control (FOC) technique [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FOC, also known as vector control, sets a two-dimensional rotating reference, called d-q, whose direct axis is usually aligned with the stator magnetic flux. Under this scheme, the torque and the active power are proportional to the q-axis component of the rotor current, whereas the q-axis component is used to regulate the reactive power flow [27,40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Figure 10 depicts the control of a DFIG with some of the additional controllers discussed in this article.…”
Section: Variable-speed Wind Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, numerical examples of the DFIG based variable-speed wind turbine (double-cage induction generator) for the power system (induction model, current model) based on the multi-input multi-output discrete-time are given to show the comparison of the proposed technique with the existing frequency-limited model reduction technique for the LTI continuous-time system. Figs (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) represent the Bode plot (magnitde, phase) comparison of corresponding ROMs obtained by existing ( [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]) and the proposed approache with the original system, each Fig contains subfigures which represent output/input Bode plot (magnitude, phase). Table . 5 and 6 provide frequency response error comparison existing ( [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]) and the proposed approaches.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%