Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2018.th2a.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Demonstration of SDN-controlled Variable-rate Fronthaul for Converged LTE-over-PON

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it also takes care of the latency encountered by the SDN controller to configure between different CPRI rates. For example, if the latency for reconfiguration between different CPRI rates is somewhere between 500ms (this is a value we experimented in our dynamicbandwidth SDR testbed implementation [16]) to 5seconds (this is the average value taken to completely reboot the SDR BBU) and if we consider normalized traffic load (for example a = 0.2) per RRU then we can write, a = λ/Kµ = 0.2 =⇒ λ = 0.2 × K × µ = 10µ (K = 50 → maximum number of users supported) Now, if we consider a moderate traffic scenario, with λ = 10 calls/min (e.g., in terms of number of users joining the cell) and µ = 1 calls/min, this means that one call, two calls and three calls are expected to arrive, within the reconfiguration window (0.5 seconds), respectively, with probabilities (p) = 0.0767, 0.0032 and 8.8739 × 10 −5 . Therefore, if we choose F l − R l < 2 (say for example F l − R l = 1), then while the SDN controller is triggering a transition to a lower CPRI rate, it is highly probable that one or more calls might arrive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it also takes care of the latency encountered by the SDN controller to configure between different CPRI rates. For example, if the latency for reconfiguration between different CPRI rates is somewhere between 500ms (this is a value we experimented in our dynamicbandwidth SDR testbed implementation [16]) to 5seconds (this is the average value taken to completely reboot the SDR BBU) and if we consider normalized traffic load (for example a = 0.2) per RRU then we can write, a = λ/Kµ = 0.2 =⇒ λ = 0.2 × K × µ = 10µ (K = 50 → maximum number of users supported) Now, if we consider a moderate traffic scenario, with λ = 10 calls/min (e.g., in terms of number of users joining the cell) and µ = 1 calls/min, this means that one call, two calls and three calls are expected to arrive, within the reconfiguration window (0.5 seconds), respectively, with probabilities (p) = 0.0767, 0.0032 and 8.8739 × 10 −5 . Therefore, if we choose F l − R l < 2 (say for example F l − R l = 1), then while the SDN controller is triggering a transition to a lower CPRI rate, it is highly probable that one or more calls might arrive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it coordinates operations with the BBU and RRU to dynamically adapt the wireless bandwidth and fronthaul rate. Recently, in [16], we have experimentally demonstrated the practical feasibility of our variable rate fronthaul concept using a software LTE BBU connected to its RRU (implemented using a USRP board [17]) via a fronthaul link operating over a PON.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BBU part of the wireless LTE system is implemented through the open source srsLTE library 9 , which provides the building blocks for implementing LTE prototypes in SDR. In our previous publication 5 we only made use of the LTE physical layer, because the MAC layer had not yet been released as open source. In this current experiment, we make use of the full-stack LTE system, e.g., including the MAC, enabling full endto-end communication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 5 , we demonstrated the concept of adaptive variable-rate fronthaul, which is enabled by Software Defined Network (SDN) and statistical Time Division Multiplexing (TDM). There, the SDN controller interacted with the BBU to monitor the cell usage, and in response adapted the cell wireless bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fronthaul bandwidth for transmitting the wireless I/Q samples is adapted to foreground traffic load, by changing the LTE sampling rate on the RRH. We have also implemented an SDN controller based on RYU [4] to control the integration of background traffic and foreground traffic, using an event-triggered scheme shown in Fig. 2.…”
Section: A Flexible-rate Mobile Fronthaul In Ponmentioning
confidence: 99%