2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2014.2309438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Comparison of Model Predictive Control and Cascaded Control of the Modular Multilevel Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, real-time implementation of MPC technique becomes a challenging task. The same has been concluded from comparison study done between classical and MPC techniques in [148]. Subsequently, new technique with three independent predictive controllers is proposed for the ac-side currents, circulating currents, and SM capacitor voltage balancing [149].…”
Section: A Emerging Multilevel Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, real-time implementation of MPC technique becomes a challenging task. The same has been concluded from comparison study done between classical and MPC techniques in [148]. Subsequently, new technique with three independent predictive controllers is proposed for the ac-side currents, circulating currents, and SM capacitor voltage balancing [149].…”
Section: A Emerging Multilevel Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…3 (a). A direct calculation of the reference to the value of (5) was shown to improve the dynamic performance of the controller [9] under transient conditions with such methods also applicable to model predictive control of the converter [8] and to MMCs operating under unbalanced conditions [11]. A circulating current control method based on the energy within the arms and controllers on the positive and negative synchronous reference frame was presented in [7].…”
Section: Circulating Current and Control In Modular Multilevel Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It promises some significant advantages for the converter control. For example, MPC can easily handle multiple variables with their boundaries and nonlinearities within a single control law as well as its concept is simple and intuitive [9]- [12]. Finite Control Set-MPC (FCS-MPC) chooses the optimized state for the converter and applies it directly to the converter switches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%