2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization of the self-healing capacity of cement based materials and its effects on the material performance: A state of the art report by COST Action SARCOS WG2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
141
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The self‐healing efficiency of encapsulation‐based self‐healing concrete is primarily evaluated from initiation of self‐healing process by creation of cracks to assessment of self‐healing performances . The related test approaches are classified in Table , including initiation of self‐healing reaction, evaluation of self‐healing efficiency, and monitoring of healing process .…”
Section: Encapsulation‐based Self‐healing Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self‐healing efficiency of encapsulation‐based self‐healing concrete is primarily evaluated from initiation of self‐healing process by creation of cracks to assessment of self‐healing performances . The related test approaches are classified in Table , including initiation of self‐healing reaction, evaluation of self‐healing efficiency, and monitoring of healing process .…”
Section: Encapsulation‐based Self‐healing Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before proceeding with Section , it is noted that this review is a product of a working group from the EU COST Action SARCOS (CA15202). This is one of three linked reviews, with the other two considering self‐healing technologies and characterization methods, respectively …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly to all the other indices which will be hereafter reviewed, its values range between 0 (no-healing; wpost-healing = wpre-cracking) and 1 (complete healing; wpost-healing = 0). It is worth here remarking that this index will only account for the closure visible at the surface of the crack, whereas internal reconstruction of the through crack material continuity, which will govern as well the recovery of the material performance can only be assessed by means of methods such as X-ray or neutron radiography and tomography, microcomputer-tomography scan and electrical methods [2]. These methods, though employed in a number of healing related studies, have hardly led so far to any quantification of crack sealing through index such as in Equation (1).…”
Section: Definition Of Healing-related Indices Of Performance Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the scenarios described above requires a likewise comprehensive characterization of the healing mechanisms [2], and hence the last but not least "W" "WHY", which can rely upon methods ranging from classical ones, such as Electronic Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-ESEM), as well Thermo-Gravimetry Analysis (TGA), X-ray Diffraction and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy to less common ones, which may go even down to the visualization of the healing products through X-ray microtomography [8] and the characterization of the signature properties of the healing products through nano-indentation [9,10].…”
Section: Experimental Quantification Of the Healing Capacity Of Cemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation