2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(00)00714-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characterization of a random metallic rough surface by spectrophotometric measurements in the visible range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is characterized by the ratio h/l, which is the relevant parameter, as shown in previous studies. 3 Moreover, a very rough surface is deemed synonymous with a large value of h/l (large slopes). In order to fit experimental conditions, computations are achieved in a back-scattering configuration; that is, the collected beam is of opposite direction to the incident collimated beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is characterized by the ratio h/l, which is the relevant parameter, as shown in previous studies. 3 Moreover, a very rough surface is deemed synonymous with a large value of h/l (large slopes). In order to fit experimental conditions, computations are achieved in a back-scattering configuration; that is, the collected beam is of opposite direction to the incident collimated beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the surface becomes rough, the incident light is also randomly reflected in all directions, modifying the reflectance spectrum. In the visible range (380 nm Ͻ Ͻ 780 nm), real surfaces, supposed isotropic and random Gaussian, can be considered as very rough ones ie, h ӷ (by instance h ϭ 1.18 m or 1.3 m, respectively, for streaked copper 3 or for streaked stainless steel 6 ). Moreover, the limit of optical physics is applicable [ie, the radius of curvature of the irregularities Ϸl 2 /h Ͼ Ͼ (l ϭ 9.46 m or 15.2 m for the previous cases, so l 2 /h ϭ 76 m or 177 m)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the "surface state" (roughness) is known to have a strong influence on the value of the diffuse reflectance factor (17), and it is shown from the preceding investigation that the roughness may vary in large proportion from one specimen to another. Therefore, the spectra of Figure 9 should only be compared to the values of the wavelengths corresponding to "accidents" occurring in the curve shape, such as slope change or absorption bands.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Spectro-photometry was performed using a goniospectro-photo-colorimeter working in back-scattering Figure 1 The investigated ceramic objects mode (17). This equipment illuminates the specimen with white light in the visible range (illuminant D65) under a given adjustable incidence angle over an area of 6 mm diameter, and collects the back-scattered light in the same direction.…”
Section: Characterisation Methods and Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can deduce the geometrical characteristic of a surface defined by the ratio of h (mean quadratic roughness) on l (correlation length) [Appendix]. 1 The facts that these measurements are nondestructive, without contact, and can be realized in situ make this method very adaptable to the study, the restoration, and the knowledge of the artistic techniques of the works of art that make up our cultural heritage. 2 The same technique was used by Simonot and Elias 3 to study the relation between the colour and surface topography of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%