2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical study on air cores for cylindrical tank draining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of 1 st order of time discretization scheme, the draining time completion obtained from the current simulation using DNS, RANS − , RANS − and LES are 91s, 72s, 70s and 101.5, respectively. The draining times for RANS − and RANS − are 8.26s and 10.26s earlier than the result obtained from the experiment by Park and Sohn [10]. Meanwhile, the draining time completion obtained from DNS and LES are 10.74s and 21.24s slower than the result obtained from the experiment by Park and Sohn [10].…”
Section: Comparison Of Drainage Timementioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of 1 st order of time discretization scheme, the draining time completion obtained from the current simulation using DNS, RANS − , RANS − and LES are 91s, 72s, 70s and 101.5, respectively. The draining times for RANS − and RANS − are 8.26s and 10.26s earlier than the result obtained from the experiment by Park and Sohn [10]. Meanwhile, the draining time completion obtained from DNS and LES are 10.74s and 21.24s slower than the result obtained from the experiment by Park and Sohn [10].…”
Section: Comparison Of Drainage Timementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The sensitivity of the results of the time discretization scheme is also assessed for all turbulence models. Table 3 compares the result of the current study with the similar study by Park and Sohn [10]. The theoretical value that is calculated from equation 10is also compared.…”
Section: Comparison Of Drainage Timementioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations