2010
DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.4.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Study on Effects of Airflow and Aqueous Ammonium Solution Temperature on Ammonia Mass Transfer Coefficient

Abstract: This paper reports the results of an investigation, based on fundamental fluid dynamics and mass transfer theory, carried out to obtain a general understanding of ammonia mass transfer from an emission surface. The effects of airflow and aqueous ammonium solution temperature on ammonia mass transfer are investigated by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling and by a mechanism modeling using dissociation constant and Henry's constant models based on the parameters measured in the experiments performe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is extremely difficult to exactly measure the surface area of the manure due to its irregular shape, but the projected manure area still represents a suitable method to approximate the surface area since the release of ammonia from manure is significantly affected by the airflow characteristics (including temperature, velocity, turbulence, etc.) above the release surface according to previous studies [ 14 ]. Therefore, manure covered underneath has a limited contribution to the total emissions and the projected area would not be considerably different from the true surface area since the height of the overlap is not large according to the field observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is extremely difficult to exactly measure the surface area of the manure due to its irregular shape, but the projected manure area still represents a suitable method to approximate the surface area since the release of ammonia from manure is significantly affected by the airflow characteristics (including temperature, velocity, turbulence, etc.) above the release surface according to previous studies [ 14 ]. Therefore, manure covered underneath has a limited contribution to the total emissions and the projected area would not be considerably different from the true surface area since the height of the overlap is not large according to the field observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to understand and model the ammonia emissions in poultry houses so as to provide information to develop appropriate mitigation and management strategies. Much work had been done to predict ammonia release from manure [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], and several types of models were developed in the literature, including statistical models [ 18 , 19 ], balance models [ 20 , 21 ], and process-based models [ 22 , 23 ]. More recently, Tong et al [ 24 ] developed a mechanistic model, which was based on the fundamental understanding of physical and biochemical processes of ammonia emissions from manure, to estimate the emissions rate ( , mg ) from laying hen manure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of a livestock building is to establish and sustain an appropriate microclimatic environment for the animals. Among the numerous environmental factors that require regulation in livestock buildings, air quality and its associated parameters are commonly regarded as crucial [17,18]. To determine the comfort thresholds of temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and concentrations of CO 2 and NH 3 for laying hens, relevant references were examined and the findings are summarized in Table 1 [19].…”
Section: Relationship Between Environment and Animal Welfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As widely known, NH3 emission is influenced by temperature and humidity. Moreover, the effect of ventilation must also be considered since it influences the emission rate (Rong et al, 2010), although this does not necessarily lead to an increase in air concentrations because the natural or forced ventilation favors its removal from the building (Bleizgys and Bagdoniene, 2016;Herbut and Angrecka, 2014).…”
Section: Farm Period T (°C) Rh (%) Outside Inside Outside Insidementioning
confidence: 99%