2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigations on the shock wave attenuation performance of blast walls with a canopy on top

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Helliker and other scientists [16,27,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] investigated many different muzzle devices including a silencer. The outputs of the models were not verified against experimental test data from muzzle blasts, which differ to conventional blast waves [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Helliker and other scientists [16,27,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] investigated many different muzzle devices including a silencer. The outputs of the models were not verified against experimental test data from muzzle blasts, which differ to conventional blast waves [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, Xiao et al (2019) extended this work to understand the role of the canopy angle. Experiments were carried out using a 3.9 kg PETN charge, placed at the centre of a 10 m diameter circle (on plan), 0.4 m above ground level.…”
Section: Indirect Loading: Barriersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While frangible walls can cause harm to people in the surroundings due to fragmentation, the use of water-filled ‘walls’ can avoid such a scenario. This shows how barriers can mitigate a blast wave by reflection, diffraction or even absorption of energy (Xiao et al, 2019). A summary of these and related work in the recent period, and details on the construction of barriers may be found in the review by Smith (2010).…”
Section: Indirect Loading: Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Das untersuchte Szenario wird dabei nicht verändert (W = 3,9 kg PETN, Abstand von der Ladung zur Schutzwand R 1 = 5 m und Abstand von der Schutzwand zur betrachteten Fassade R 2 = 4 m). Für das Szenario ist gemäß[14], ab einer Wandlänge von 7 m, der Einfluss der seitlichen Umströ mung der Schutzwand vernachlässigbar.…”
unclassified