2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Impingement Air Jet for a Heat Sink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical predictions based on k-ε reliable turbulence model were in good coherence with experimental results. The Nusselt number correlations obtained from the experimental and numerical results were very close to each other and had a high accuracy rate [13].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical predictions based on k-ε reliable turbulence model were in good coherence with experimental results. The Nusselt number correlations obtained from the experimental and numerical results were very close to each other and had a high accuracy rate [13].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Moreover, ANSYS k-ԑ model options were used for numerical analysis. The model was preferred because it yielded convergent results in previous studies comparing the experimental and numerical results [10,13,21,22]. The analyses were performed for three different nozzle diameters (D=50, 63, and 75mm), 4 different flow velocities, and three different heat fluxes (q=2222, 3333, 4444 W/m 2 ) for the heat sink.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models for Design 1 and 3 are in high agreement (less than 2% difference) whereas the models for Design 2 have a higher difference. The comparisons indicate a good confidence level of the heat exchanger CFD models, where acceptable simulations using Ansys-Fluent turbulence model usually have less than 10 % maximum difference [33].…”
Section: Validation Of Cfd Modelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…25 Dolayısıyla Filistin'den başlayan Amvas Vebası, daha sonra Şam bölgesinin tamamına yayıldı. 26 Hatta Irak bölgesi olan Basra'ya da sıçradı. 27 Fakat Mekke ve Medine bu salgından etkilenmedi.…”
Section: İ S T E Munclassified