2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigation of material heterogeneity in shot peened aluminium alloy AA2024-T351

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded from the EBSD analysis that the microstructural changes due to local LSP treatment are relatively moderate compared to those obtained in the study by Gariépy et al (2013) [4]. Gariépy et al (2013) [4] investigated the microstructural state of AA2024-T351 after it was shot peened using the EBSD analysis.…”
Section: Figure 2 Crystal Orientation Maps and Inverse Pole Figures mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be concluded from the EBSD analysis that the microstructural changes due to local LSP treatment are relatively moderate compared to those obtained in the study by Gariépy et al (2013) [4]. Gariépy et al (2013) [4] investigated the microstructural state of AA2024-T351 after it was shot peened using the EBSD analysis.…”
Section: Figure 2 Crystal Orientation Maps and Inverse Pole Figures mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Gariépy et al (2013) [4] investigated the microstructural state of AA2024-T351 after it was shot peened using the EBSD analysis. The authors observed an unindexable structure in the first few micrometres with large dislocation densities and extremely small dislocation substructures.…”
Section: Figure 2 Crystal Orientation Maps and Inverse Pole Figures mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation of shot peening A single shot impact event was simulated with ABAQUS Explicit with the model developed by Gariepy et al [1,6]. The shot was modeled as an analytical rigid semi-sphere and its mass and rotary inertia were determined from its diameter based on an assumed density of 3850 kg/m 3 .…”
Section: Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validating the accuracy of numerical predictions is a challenging task since the stress field resulting from shot peening is produced by a random and unpredictable shot impact sequence, and, as a result, is inhomogeneous at the scale of the impingements across the affected volume [5,6]. Consequently, it is very difficult to determine the correct initial parameters that would result in the exact same impact sequence to that obtained experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is almost equal to the 0.2% proof stress of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy 26 and the values obtained using other peening methods such as nanosecond laser peening, shot peening, or ultrasonic peening. [27][28][29][30][31][32] The compressive stress decreases to zero around 90 lm, which is around one tenth of the peened depth obtained by nanosecond laser peening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%