2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of laser shock peening on the microstructure and fatigue crack propagation behaviour of thin AA2024 specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the areas for stable crack growth for the specimen without LSP treatment (33%) and the LSP‐treated specimen (33%) are comparable (Figure 9A,B), the effect of LSP could be only attributed to the retardation of the fatigue crack growth. However, in comparison with the propagation of long through‐the‐thickness fatigue cracks, where crack closure is the main mechanism, 30,33,57 any clear indications on crack closure could not be observed in the fractured surfaces of the LSP‐treated specimens investigated in the current study. When analysing details of the SEM‐images of fractured surfaces (areas with a stable fatigue crack growth close to an initial fatigue crack), the specimen without LSP treatment shows very fine fatigue lines and fatigue striations within fatigue crack paths (see Figure 10A).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the areas for stable crack growth for the specimen without LSP treatment (33%) and the LSP‐treated specimen (33%) are comparable (Figure 9A,B), the effect of LSP could be only attributed to the retardation of the fatigue crack growth. However, in comparison with the propagation of long through‐the‐thickness fatigue cracks, where crack closure is the main mechanism, 30,33,57 any clear indications on crack closure could not be observed in the fractured surfaces of the LSP‐treated specimens investigated in the current study. When analysing details of the SEM‐images of fractured surfaces (areas with a stable fatigue crack growth close to an initial fatigue crack), the specimen without LSP treatment shows very fine fatigue lines and fatigue striations within fatigue crack paths (see Figure 10A).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…LSP treatment has a strong beneficial effect on the fatigue performance of structural components because the compressive residual stress field induced in the material considerably retards fatigue crack growth 27–34 . Therefore, a significant improvement in the fatigue behaviour and lifetime prolongation can be achieved for components and structures with surface cracks 27,28,31,34 as well as through‐thickness cracks 29,30,32,33 . Lin et al have investigated the effect of LSP on the fatigue strength of engine components subjected to foreign object damage (FOD), where LSP is applied before FOD 35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison to the base material shows that a significant change has taken place due to local plastic deformations induced by the propagating shock waves induced by LP. Kashaev et al [25] reached a similar conclusion. However, different changes in local orientation were observed between the two applied advancing directions.…”
Section: Influence Of Advancing Directionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…On the other hand, compressive residual stresses introduced by LSP are deeper and higher than by SP [27]. Furthermore, SP causes significant changes in microstructure [28]; however, LSP, in turn, does not lead to such changes [29]. In this regard, the detrimental effect seen for SP when moving from the medium to high cycle fatigue regime is not expected for LSP.…”
Section: Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 93%