Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices

Abstract

ObjectivesSecondary fracture healing is strongly influenced by the stiffness of the bone-fixator system. Biomechanical tests are extensively used to investigate stiffness and strength of fixation devices. The stiffness values reported in the literature for locked plating, however, vary by three orders of magnitude. The aim of this study was to examine the influence that the method of restraint and load application has on the stiffness produced, the strain distribution within the bone, and the stresses in the implant for locking plate constructs.MethodsSynthetic composite bones were used to evaluate experimentally the influence of four different methods of loading and restraining specimens, all used in recent previous studies. Two plate types and three screw arrangements were also evaluated for each loading scenario. Computational models were also developed and validated using the experimental tests.ResultsThe method of loading was found to affect the gap stiffness strongly (by up to six times) but also the magnitude of the plate stress and the location and magnitude of strains at the bone-screw interface.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the method of loading is responsible for much of the difference in reported stiffness values in the literature. It also shows that previous contradictory findings, such as the influence of working length and very large differences in failure loads, can be readily explained by the choice of loading condition.Cite this article: A. MacLeod, A. H. R. W. Simpson, P. Pankaj. Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:111–120. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0074.R2.

The effect of plate design, bridging span, and fracture healing on the performance of high tibial osteotomy plates

“…50,51 However, they used a highly constrained experimental setup, which is likely to have influenced the results. 31 Additionally, Röderer et al 51 measured very small values of IFM in one cadaveric model (0.05 mm at 1000 N) examining an alternative screw type, which they found dramatically increased the IFM to 0.16 mm at 1000 N. A previous experimental and computational study by Luo et al 28 used a similar loading regime to the present study and found IFM values for a TomoFix implant placed in the same orientation as the present study to be 0.93 mm at 2000 N.…”

“…This assumption dramatically increases the construct stiffness while also lowering predictions of plate stress. 31 Additionally, previous HTO computational studies have not considered the influence of healing at the fracture site.…”

Comparison of the Pull‐Out Strength between a Novel Micro‐Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine

“…Rigid implants prevent stability by controlling the movement between implants and segments. High shear stress and stiffness after rigid fixation increase the load transfer through the implant and bone-implant interface, leading to damage of the bone and early failure of the interface [32][33][34] . The basic mechanics of the micro-dynamic pedicle screw reduce the stress concentration between the parts of the implant and the bone-implant interface, permitting physiological load transfer and appropriate spinal motion.…”

Distinguishing fact from fiction in finite element analysis

“…Such boundary conditions rarely reflect in vivo reality, but approximate it to different degrees. The importance of boundary conditions depends on the problem and the outcome variable being investigated [13]. In most experimental mechanical testing studies and FE models the contribution of muscles and ligaments is ignored [4,6].…”