2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical analyses of magnesium alloy hot workability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although warm or hot forming of the AZ31 alloy is more favourable than cold forming as shown by e.g. Abbassi et al, 4 the dissipated plastic strain‐energy density during the first variable load cycle of AZ31 increases with higher temperature as can be seen from the results in Figure 8D. The ratio of the dissipated energy density during the nested cycles is not so distinguishable due to the scatter of experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although warm or hot forming of the AZ31 alloy is more favourable than cold forming as shown by e.g. Abbassi et al, 4 the dissipated plastic strain‐energy density during the first variable load cycle of AZ31 increases with higher temperature as can be seen from the results in Figure 8D. The ratio of the dissipated energy density during the nested cycles is not so distinguishable due to the scatter of experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…2) where ε f is equivalent plastic strain, p is the average value of the three normal stresses and q is the Von Mises equivalent stress. Material constants, taken from the paper by Abbassi et al [19], are reported in Table 3. The sheet was modeled as a deformable object, using the shell type elements S4RT option (5 integration points through the thickness), with a thickness of 1.2 mm, while the tool was modeled as a rigid element with a hemispherical shape having a diameter of 12 mm.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workpiece plastic behavior is defined by the Johnson-Cook (JC) model due to the presence of high temperature, strain, and strain rate conditions over the DSFSW process (equation ( 1)). 28 s…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%