2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and modeling investigation of the failure resistance of Advanced High Strength Steels spot welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…increased linearly with the welding current rising from 10 to 15 kA. Generally, a larger nugget diameter can bear a higher load [16]. As can be found in Figure 3b, the tensile-shear load increased linearly when the welding current ranged from 10 to 12 kA.…”
Section: Effect Of Welding Parameters On Nugget Size and Tensile-sheasupporting
confidence: 53%
“…increased linearly with the welding current rising from 10 to 15 kA. Generally, a larger nugget diameter can bear a higher load [16]. As can be found in Figure 3b, the tensile-shear load increased linearly when the welding current ranged from 10 to 12 kA.…”
Section: Effect Of Welding Parameters On Nugget Size and Tensile-sheasupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Such investigations are however necessary in the global context of vehicle structure optimization introduced above. As a consequence, a number of studies have been dedicated since the 2000s to AHSS welding [8,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and their heterogeneous configurations [15,[26][27][28][29]. Several conclusions can be highlighted in this context: (i) the frequent existence of a critical nugget diameter for failure mode transition (depending on sheet thicknesses) [13]; (ii) the fact that the failure mode of spot welds is not a characteristic of their strength [19]; and (iii) the positive deviation of Cross Tension Strength (CTS) observed for AHSS dissimilar spot welding configurations [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength and failure behavior of spot welded joints under specific combined loading conditions, mainly Tension-Shear (TS) and Cross-Tension (CT) loading, have been investigated in several studies, and failure modes were categorized as full and partial interfacial failures (FIF and PIF), round button (RB), and round button in SCHAZ (RBH) failure modes [8][9][10]. Finite element method has been used as the main computational tool to understand the mechanical behavior of spot welds with particular attention to local deformation and failure characteristics as well as the weld geometry on weld's strength [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%