2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-014-3331-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and model study of the formation of chitosan-tripolyphosphate-siRNA nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Table 1 does not allow us to determine whether the particles have a genuine isoelectric point (pI, the pH at which the particles carry a net zero net charge) or it is because the surface charge gradually approaches a zero charge as the pH is raised. The latter is illustrated in Figure S3 and is consistent with earlier observations that the tripolyphosphate seems to be located primarily in the particle matrix and not on the surface [Schrøder et al, 2014;Huang and Lapitsky, 2011]. Hence, an increase in pH to 7 and beyond is not expected to result in a negative surface charge and hence a negative zeta potential.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Cellular Uptake Of Chitosan-tpp Particlesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data in Table 1 does not allow us to determine whether the particles have a genuine isoelectric point (pI, the pH at which the particles carry a net zero net charge) or it is because the surface charge gradually approaches a zero charge as the pH is raised. The latter is illustrated in Figure S3 and is consistent with earlier observations that the tripolyphosphate seems to be located primarily in the particle matrix and not on the surface [Schrøder et al, 2014;Huang and Lapitsky, 2011]. Hence, an increase in pH to 7 and beyond is not expected to result in a negative surface charge and hence a negative zeta potential.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Cellular Uptake Of Chitosan-tpp Particlesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To optimize the TPP:glucosamine molar ratio the concentration of TPP was varied and the final volume of 350 µL was obtained by the addition of de-ionized water. 1.25 mL of chitosan solution was transferred to 4 mL glass vials (Ø 14.7 mm) and mixed under magnetic stirring (750 rpm) with 300 µL of a TPP/protein solution added by one fast injection [Schrøder et al, 2014]. The final concentration of protein (BSA or p53) was 0.2 mg/mL.…”
Section: Preparation Of Protein-loaded Chitosan-tpp Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower surface charge (zeta potential) of CS:OVA nanoparticles compared to CS only systems is expected due to OVA's negative charge (reported zeta potential of -20 to -25 mV (Niu et al, 2014) at pH 6.0-6.7), attenuating CS's positive surface charge. The observed zeta potential values of CS:OVA nanoparticles of 37.9 mV and 9.68 mV in dH2O and HBSS, respectively, are comparable to other studies, which reported ranges between 7.88-25 mV (Jana, Maji, Nayak, Sen, & Basu, 2013;Schrøder, Long, & Olsen, 2014).…”
Section: In Vivo Studiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The size distribution and overall surface charge (zeta potential; ζ) of OMVs and CS coated OMVs were measured as described elsewhere with minor changes [110,111]. Concisely, OMVs alone and CS coated OMVs were diluted (1:100 dilution) in PBS for size and milliQ water for charge analysis followed by sonication for 15 min.…”
Section: Dynamic Light Scattering (Dls) and Measurement Of Zeta Potential (ζ)mentioning
confidence: 99%