1994
DOI: 10.2514/3.11985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental, analytical, and computational methods applied to hypersonic compression ramp flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks in pressure and heat transfer seem more pronounced for condition G, which suggests a greater spreading of the compression waves and hence a larger separated region than conditions B and D. Also, in view of its higher Reynolds number, the growth length of the reattaching boundary layer may be smaller for condition G than for conditions B and D, which could also explain the relatively higher heat transfer (Simeonides et al 1994).…”
Section: Corner Angle = 18 •mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peaks in pressure and heat transfer seem more pronounced for condition G, which suggests a greater spreading of the compression waves and hence a larger separated region than conditions B and D. Also, in view of its higher Reynolds number, the growth length of the reattaching boundary layer may be smaller for condition G than for conditions B and D, which could also explain the relatively higher heat transfer (Simeonides et al 1994).…”
Section: Corner Angle = 18 •mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The subscript fp refers to the flat-plate value at the location corresponding to the peak value. Simeonides et al (1994) recognized that for separated flows, the growth length scale of the reattaching boundary layer, L pk , plays an important role in determining the level of peak heating for separated flows. The peak heating for separated flows was shown to be given by…”
Section: General Features Of Compression Corner Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computations often underpredict the length of separation, 16,[81][82][83][84] but some authors report predictions that both underestimate and overestimate experimental L sep depending on the numerical grid or depending on the experiment simulated. [85][86][87][88] Though it has been noted that the computed position of separation generally moves upstream with increased grid resolution, 89 both Grasso et al 86 and Rizzetta and Mach 87 have clearly demonstrated that the solution depends not just on the overall grid resolution, as characterized by the number of cells in each spatial direction, but also on exactly how those cells are distributed. Results can be extremely sensitive to such parameters as the spatial distribution of cells in the interaction region, and the aspect ratio of cells at the leading edge, at separation, and at reattachment.…”
Section: Viscous Double-wedge Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the numerical results, experimental data were obtained from the literature, Refs. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60], and these residts are presented in Tables A.2 The preceding results indicate that the upstream influence associated with ramp flowfields is different from that of shock impingement flowfields. This is due in part to the fact that the boundary layer induces a small turning angle which produces an effective increase in pressure change for shock impingement flowfields and an effective decrease in pressure change for ramp flowfields.…”
Section: Ipns Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%