Experiential avoidance and well-being: A daily diary analysis

Abstract

Experiential avoidance (EA) is a regulatory strategy characterised by efforts to control or avoid unpleasant thoughts, feelings and bodily sensations. Most studies of EA have used trait measures without considering the effects of EA on psychological functioning in naturalistic settings. To address this gap, we used daily diary methodology to examine the influence of EA of anxiety on everyday well-being. For two weeks, 89 participants provided daily reports of EA, positive and negative affect, enjoyment of daily events and meaning in life (MIL). Daily EA predicted higher negative affect, lower positive affect, less enjoyment of daily events (exercising, eating food and listening to music) and less MIL. The effect of EA on positive affect was not accounted for by the amount of negative affect experienced. Our daily measure of EA was a stronger predictor of daily well-being than a traditional trait measure (The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire). Taken together, results offer insights into the adverse effects of EA on daily well-being and suggest that EA is a context-specific regulatory strategy that might be best captured using a state-dependent measure.

Anhedonia is associated with suicidal ideation independently of depression: A meta-analysis

“…Indeed, depressed individuals may enjoy positive daily life events (i.e., experiencing hedonic pleasure) when experiential avoidance is low, whereas they show impaired reactivity when avoidance is high (Hershenberg, Mavandadi, Wright, & Thase, ). Experiential avoidance can thus dampen pleasant emotions and exacerbate unpleasant ones (Machell, Goodman, & Kashdan, ).…”

A 7‐year follow‐up study of the Mindfulness‐Based Program for Infertility: Are there long‐term effects?

“…This emotion regulation process comprises two related components: unwillingness to remain in touch with aversive private experiences (including bodily sensations, emotions, thoughts, memories, and behavioural predispositions) and action to change aversive experiences or the events that trigger them (Hayes & Smith, 2005). Furthermore, previous research using a naturalistic approach of experiential avoidance found that it is a context-specific regulatory strategy (Machell, Goodman, & Kashdan, 2015). The experience of an infertility diagnosis and the difficulties of medical treatment may lead to intensification of negative self-referential thoughts and depressive or anxiety feelings.…”

One year follow-up and mediation in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adult depression

“…A recent study indicated that daily assessments of experiential avoidance were a stronger predictor of daily well-being than the AAQ scores, measured daily. This indicates that mediational processes may be context speci c [71]. Related to these measurement issues, there is conceptual confusion about the actual content measured with the AAQ-II that was suggested to measure acceptance and experiential avoidance, but also psychological exibility [34].…”