“…First, although the current study presented children with a relatively “lean” learning context, future work might consider how various contextual factors may mediate the effects of counterfactual reasoning on discriminating candidate causes. For example, prior work shows that counterfactual reasoning is closely related to a variety of social‐cognitive variables, including curiosity (FitzGibbon, Moll, Carboni, Lee, & Dehghani, 2019), the valence of an outcome (e.g., German, 1999; Mandel, 2003), the learner’s emotional state (e.g., regret and relief; McCormack, O'Connor, Cherry, Beck, & Feeney, 2019; McMullen & Markman, 2000; Weisberg & Beck, 2012), and their theory of mind (e.g., Guajardo & Turley‐Ames, 2004; Riggs & Peterson, 2000; Riggs, Peterson, Robinson, & Mitchell, 1998). Thus, there remain a variety of open questions regarding how these variables may interact with the current findings.…”