The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.553438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences With Health Care Services in Switzerland Among Immigrant Women With Chronic Illnesses

Abstract: Introduction: Descriptive data indicate a high burden of chronic illness among immigrant women in Switzerland. Little is known about how immigrant women with chronic illnesses experience healthcare services. This paper presents a methodological approach theoretically informed by Sen's capability approach and Levesque's framework of access to healthcare to study patient-reported experiences (PREs) of Swiss healthcare services among immigrant women with chronic conditions. Methods: We conducted 48 semi-structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a sub‐study of MIWOCA, short for Migrant Women's Health Care Needs for Chronic Illness Services in Switzerland (SNF NRP74 2017‐2020), a larger research project in which we researched access to and quality of healthcare service among women in Switzerland with chronic illness and migration experience. 18 , 19 MIWOCA included migrant and native‐born women with chronic illnesses across diverse cultural and social backgrounds as well as care providers and other relevant stakeholders. Women participated in interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a sub‐study of MIWOCA, short for Migrant Women's Health Care Needs for Chronic Illness Services in Switzerland (SNF NRP74 2017‐2020), a larger research project in which we researched access to and quality of healthcare service among women in Switzerland with chronic illness and migration experience. 18 , 19 MIWOCA included migrant and native‐born women with chronic illnesses across diverse cultural and social backgrounds as well as care providers and other relevant stakeholders. Women participated in interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information about the study population, sampling strategies and data collection has been described previously. 18 In the current paper, we present a methodological approach to linking data sources based on the empirical fieldwork conducted during the MIWOCA project. We used data from multiple sources: observations and field notes from regular project meetings and three stakeholder dialogues, an analysis of project documents (such as minutes, reports, notes, patient vignettes, MIWOCA evidence and policy briefs), as well as a re‐analysis of qualitative semi‐structured interviews with women with chronic illnesses and health/social service providers ( n = 48; n = 12) and two FGDs ( n = 15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examining access to healthcare through patients’ perspectives is relevant for this study because it addresses aspects of healthcare that are difficult to measure, such as satisfaction, participation, perceptions, and preferences [ 23 – 26 ]. This perspective also provides data on “why” problems occur [ 24 ]. Thus, it makes a unique contribution to planning efforts for improving healthcare services based on users’ own needs and expectations [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective also provides data on “why” problems occur [ 24 ]. Thus, it makes a unique contribution to planning efforts for improving healthcare services based on users’ own needs and expectations [ 24 ]. This approach is in line with the World Health Organization’s framework on integrated people-centered health services, which calls for health systems to prioritize people when developing health systems [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%