“…We list some specific examples here: - HIV‐infected children may suffer from compromised brain development, such as decreased gray matter volume as shown in MRI studies of vertically infected children (Yu et al., 2019); this brain development may in turn have been influenced by when the child was diagnosed (as an infant or at school‐going age), as well as when the child started treatment, and how appropriate early treatment was in terms of the effectiveness of the drug combination, and whether these were delivered in appropriate dosages (Nielsen‐Saines, 2019; Van de Wijer et al., 2019). HIV‐diagnosed children may also be highly affected by contextual variables such as when and how their HIV diagnosis was disclosed to them (Sariah et al., 2016), and whether their school environments promote stigma or encourage acceptance and support of children infected with HIV (MacCarthy et al., 2018).
- HIV orphaned children may be differentiated according to whether they are missing their mothers and/or their fathers, and this may influence who their primary caregiver is (e.g., father, grandmother, aunt, or uncle), and with which other relatives they may live (e.g., a step‐mother and step‐siblings, maternal or paternal relatives, cousins) (Beegle, Filmer, Stokes, & Tiererova, 2010); they may live with non‐relatives, such as in institutions, where they may experience less than optimal conditions, such as diminished care compared to caregivers’ biological children (Coneus, Mühlenweg, & Stichnoth, 2014) or short‐term attachments, as happen in orphanage settings (Richter & Norman, 2010).
…”