2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences with compounding surveillance and social control as a barrier to safe consumption service access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, some scholars that have examined policing within specific harm reduction contexts [for example, operating safe consumption sites (SCS)] have argued that police should remain excluded from the health sphere because the disciplinary conditions created by police, often under the guise of responding to social disorder, undermine public health efforts and foster distrust of police among PWUD [ 51 ]. A recent study of policing boundaries for an SCS found that from the perspective of service users and SCS staff, police should not be present at the SCS as they are a deterrent to service uptake [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, some scholars that have examined policing within specific harm reduction contexts [for example, operating safe consumption sites (SCS)] have argued that police should remain excluded from the health sphere because the disciplinary conditions created by police, often under the guise of responding to social disorder, undermine public health efforts and foster distrust of police among PWUD [ 51 ]. A recent study of policing boundaries for an SCS found that from the perspective of service users and SCS staff, police should not be present at the SCS as they are a deterrent to service uptake [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken as a whole, these rationales point to processes whereby potential privacy violations are deemed justifiable, surveillance practices are deemed reasonable, and institutional demands are privileged over client preference for low barrier access. Indeed, the mobilization of these rationales effaces concerns among PWUD, propelling barriers to access services ( Greene et al, 2022 ). An interrogation of the rationales forwarded to justify surveillance underscore their politically or ideologically motivated official logics, as a recent review of SCS in Alberta has illustrated ( Greene et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Key Features Of Harm Reduction Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the mobilization of these rationales effaces concerns among PWUD, propelling barriers to access services ( Greene et al, 2022 ). An interrogation of the rationales forwarded to justify surveillance underscore their politically or ideologically motivated official logics, as a recent review of SCS in Alberta has illustrated ( Greene et al, 2022 ). We argue that this is far from an inevitable or necessary component of delivering health and harm reduction services to PWUD, as several innovative low threshold models providing fully anonymous access demonstrate ( Wallace et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Key Features Of Harm Reduction Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One notable exception is the research examining the experiences and perceptions of police treatment among people who use drugs (PWUD) in Canada. Scholars have documented significant primary and secondary public health impacts associated with adversarial policing, which includes the impact on PWUD’s access to harm reduction/healthcare services and the secondary effects (or consequences) that lack of service access can have on individual health and wellbeing [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. These studies reveal that how the police treat PWUD can have critical public health implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%