2006
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2005.084475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees in Houston Shelters: Implications for Future Planning

Abstract: Our results highlight the need for better plans for emergency communication and evacuation of low-income and disabled citizens in future disasters and shed light on choices facing policymakers in planning for the long-term health care needs of vulnerable populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
274
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
11
274
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These high rates of chronic conditions and mental health needs were subsequently corroborated in survey research done by Columbia University's National Center for Disaster Preparedness with families living in temporary FEMA-subsidized housing, typically mobile-home-style trailers. In common with earlier survey data of adult Katrina evacuees in Houston [10], the families in FEMA housing in both Louisiana and Mississippi were disproportionately low-income and African-American. Abramson and Garfield [28,29] observed that low-income families making <$10,000/y were the hardest hit economically by the hurricane, with 53% losing all source of income (compared with 15% for families with income >$20,000/y).…”
Section: Mental Health Responsesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These high rates of chronic conditions and mental health needs were subsequently corroborated in survey research done by Columbia University's National Center for Disaster Preparedness with families living in temporary FEMA-subsidized housing, typically mobile-home-style trailers. In common with earlier survey data of adult Katrina evacuees in Houston [10], the families in FEMA housing in both Louisiana and Mississippi were disproportionately low-income and African-American. Abramson and Garfield [28,29] observed that low-income families making <$10,000/y were the hardest hit economically by the hurricane, with 53% losing all source of income (compared with 15% for families with income >$20,000/y).…”
Section: Mental Health Responsesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Many were initially sheltered at the Superdome or the Convention Center. One third of the adults surveyed report having a child with them, which would suggest a minimum of approximately 15,000 children between the two refuges of last resort in New Orleans [10]. Children in the shelter environment pose special challenges because of their typically curious and active behavior.…”
Section: Obtaining Sheltermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done using both stated preference and revealed preference data. For instance, Whitehead et al (2000) and Brodie et al (2006) report that people with higher income and education tend to evacuate towards hotels and motels, while people with lower income and education tend to evacuate to shelters, based on post-hurricane evacuation data. Deka and Carnegie (2010) build on this by conducting a stated preference survey relating socio-economic and demographic characteristics to the decision whether to evacuate to a shelter location or to a non-shelter location, such as friends or relatives and a hotel or motel.…”
Section: Factors Determining Type Of Evacuation Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is essentially the gravity-based trip distribution model which is applied to predict the origin-destination matrices used as model input in all the traffic simulation models introduced in ''Past and current evacuation traffic simulation models'' section. In other studies, the different location types and accompanying different determining factors as identified by Whitehead et al (2000) and Brodie et al (2006) are recognized. For instance, Cuellar et al (2009) compute attraction potentials per type of location.…”
Section: Destination Choice Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unrealistic to expect patients or their families to shoulder the major burden of such preparations alone. Some individuals who did not evacuate, despite the evacuation order, were not able to evacuate for a physical reason by themselves or because they had to care for someone else (Brodie, Weltzien, Altman, Blendon, & Benson, 2011). It would be effective to prepare evacuation methods and provide for the secure evacuation of supporters in patients' living environments and health professionals who support everyday life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%