2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.

Abstract: The majority of dentists felt that digital image quality was the same or better than film and exposure and examination times were reduced. However, technical problems and repairs were common.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10][11] While the literature does include one study that evaluates the effectiveness of web-based instruction in the interpretation of anatomy using CBCT images, 12 no information appears in the literature regarding students' knowledge and attitudes about CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] While the literature does include one study that evaluates the effectiveness of web-based instruction in the interpretation of anatomy using CBCT images, 12 no information appears in the literature regarding students' knowledge and attitudes about CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, all dentists should change to a fast speed film. [10], Hellen-Halme (51 -75 %) [11] and Wenzel and Møystad (55 %) [12]. Blendl et al claim that the digital system investigated in their study was at least twice as sensitive as the most sensitive film-based system [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wenzel ve ark. (14,15) ve Miles ve ark. (16) yapt›klar› anket çal›şmalar›nda bulgular›m›za benzer şekilde dijital radyografinin maliyetinin yüksek olmas›n› tercihi etkileyen en önemli faktör olarak saptam›şlard›r (14-16).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified