2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:cape.0000013600.10283.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience from the Operation of a Conical Vortex Tube with Natural Gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, previous experimental studies show that the maximum refrigeration capacity and the adiabatic efficiency of a RHVT always falls within the range of 50-70% cold mass fraction, irrespective of the diameter of the cold outlet [25,26]. As seen in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned, previous experimental studies show that the maximum refrigeration capacity and the adiabatic efficiency of a RHVT always falls within the range of 50-70% cold mass fraction, irrespective of the diameter of the cold outlet [25,26]. As seen in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Past experimental studies show that the maximum refrigeration capacity and the adiabatic efficiency of a RHVT always fall within the range of 50-70% cold mass fraction, irrespective of the diameter of the cold outlet [25,26]. Nimbalkar and Muller [26] tried to explain this issue by considering the movement of the stagnation point inside the tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikolaev et al [24] observed the range of 0.6e0.7 for optimum cold mass fraction. Poshernev and Khodorkov [25] stated optimum cold mass fraction is occurred between 0.5 and 0.6. Nimbalkar and Muller [19] are the only researchers which reported a fixed value of 0.6 for optimum cold mass fraction.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is why there is an optimum point at which maximum cold temperature difference occurs. Nikolaev et al [24], Poshernev and Khodorkov [25] and Nimbalkar and Muller [19] reported different optimum cold mass fraction. It is here believed that vortex tube design and pressure distribution are the reasons for variation in optimum cold mass fraction.…”
Section: Nozzle Area Effect On Vortex Tube Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Poshernev and Khodorkov (2003) also stated that the maximum magnitude of temperature separation and effectiveness of the vortex tube was found between 0.5-0.6 cold mass fraction. The results of the present experimental investigation also follow a similar trend, obtaining maximum performance at 0.6 cold mass fraction.…”
Section: Fig 9 Line Diagram Of Primary and Secondary Flow Inside The ...mentioning
confidence: 98%