2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience-based mediation of feeding and oviposition behaviors in the cotton bollworm: Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Abstract: Experience is well known to affect sensory-guided behaviors in many herbivorous insects. Here, we investigated the effects of natural feeding experiences of Helicoverpa armigera larvae on subsequent preferences of larval approaching and feeding, as well as the effect of host-contacting experiences of mated females on subsequent ovipositional preference. The results show that the extent of experience-induced preference, expressed by statistical analysis, depended on the plant species paired with the experienced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts the natal habitat preference induction (NHPI) hypothesis, which proposes that adult oviposition should shift to the same plant consumed by the larvae, especially if the plant was of high quality (Davis and Stamps 2004;Moreau et al 2008;Lhomme et al 2018). These negative results, however, support those of similar experiments done in other lepidopterans (Zhang et al 2007;Janz et al 2009;Hu et al 2018). The disconnect between feeding and oviposition behaviors might be due to the encoding of the odor learning experiences by two separate groups of glomeruli in the antennal lobe (Bisch-Knaden et al 2018), or to different behavioral responses resulting from tissuespecific activation of the same set of odor receptors (Joseph and Heberlein 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contradicts the natal habitat preference induction (NHPI) hypothesis, which proposes that adult oviposition should shift to the same plant consumed by the larvae, especially if the plant was of high quality (Davis and Stamps 2004;Moreau et al 2008;Lhomme et al 2018). These negative results, however, support those of similar experiments done in other lepidopterans (Zhang et al 2007;Janz et al 2009;Hu et al 2018). The disconnect between feeding and oviposition behaviors might be due to the encoding of the odor learning experiences by two separate groups of glomeruli in the antennal lobe (Bisch-Knaden et al 2018), or to different behavioral responses resulting from tissuespecific activation of the same set of odor receptors (Joseph and Heberlein 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…; Hu et al. ). The disconnect between feeding and oviposition behaviors might be due to the encoding of the odor learning experiences by two separate groups of glomeruli in the antennal lobe (Bisch‐Knaden et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For predators that can exploit a range of prey that vary in quality and availability, prior feeding experiences could help them to select oviposition sites with higher prey quality for their offspring (Fréchette et al ., ). Most studies on such behavioral responses in arthropods have focused on phytophagous insects (e.g., Anderson et al ., ; Zhang & Liu, ), which are more likely to oviposit on patches where they have previous feeding experience (Michaud, ; Hu et al ., ), even when the plant was nutritionally inferior for egg production and adult survival in some species (Coyle et al ., ). There are few studies about the effect of feeding experience on the oviposition site selection of predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Helicoverpa armigera were identified 60 olfactory receptors, 19 ionotropic receptors, 34 olfactory binding proteins, 18 chemosensory proteins and 2 neuron-sensory membrane proteins (Zhang et al, 2015). In addition, H. armigera previous feeding experiences can positively influence future food preference (Hu et al, 2018). The knowledge of the nutritional needs of pests contributes to understanding their population dynamics and potential for damage (Slanky Junior and Wheeler, 1992;Parra, 1991;Cohen, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%