Expansile gas concentration in primary pseudophakic retinal detachment repair, effect on intraocular pressure and outcomes; the Manchester Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Study

Moussa, George; Jalil, Assad; Ivanova, Tsveta; Cristescu, Irina-Elena; Ferrara, Mariantonia; Lippera, Myrta; Jasani, Kirti M; Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe; Patton, Niall

doi:10.1007/s00417-023-06067-4

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The SSAS for primary PPV in RD with inferior retinal breaks in detached retina ranges from 76% to 95.4% in the literature. 18,19,22 Our higher success rate may be attributed to several factors, including the exclusion of proliferative vitreoretinopathy C or giant retinal tears and the inclusion of only pseudophakic eyes. Indeed, patients with PRD are known to have favorable anatomical outcomes, and this has been attributed to the better view and peripheral retinal access allowing for an improved peripheral vitreous shave and, thus, increased volume of gas tamponade.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Sf6 Compared With C2f6 for Inferior Rhegmatogenous Retinal Repair

Moussa,

Jalil,

Lippera

et al. 2024

Retina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose- To compare SF6 relative to C2F6 in the anatomical and functional outcomes following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for uncomplicated primary pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior causative breaks. Methods- This is a retrospective, comparative study on eyes with PRD with inferior causative breaks that had small-gauge PPV repair using SF6 and C2F6 tamponade between 2011-2020 at a tertiary centre in the UK. Primary outcome was single surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and the secondary outcomes, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Propensity score matching (PSM), using preoperative findings as covariates to account for relevant confounders, was performed. Results- From 162 PRD eyes with inferior causative breaks, the median (interquartile range) follow-up was 82 (52-182) days. The SSAS was 156 (96.3%) overall; 47/47 (100.0%) and 109/115 (94.8%) in the SF6 and C2F6 groups, respectively (p=0.182). Relative to the SF6 group, the C2F6 group had a higher mean number of tears (SF6:3.1[2.0], C2F6:4.5[2.7], p=0.002) and greater RD extent (SF6:5.3[2.9], C2F6:6.2[2.6] clock hours, p=0.025). Following PSM analysis, 80 eyes were matched with 40 in each group to homogenise preoperative factors. No significant difference was found in SSAS and BCVA between groups following PSM. Conclusions- Primary PPV with gas tamponade leads to a high SSAS rate in uncomplicated PRD with inferior causative breaks with no additional benefit associated with long-acting tamponade when comparing C2F6 with SF6.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Sf6 Compared With C2f6 for Inferior Rhegmatogenous Retinal Repair

Moussa,

Jalil,

Lippera

et al. 2024

Retina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes after vitreoretinal surgery: a single-center study in South Korea

Yoon

Kim

et al. 2023

BMC Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Information regarding incidence of treatment plan changes may be useful when discussing postoperative treatment plans for patients. Moreover, it may help establish a standardized postoperative treatment plan. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes in patients following vitreoretinal surgery and investigate its risk factors. Methods This single-center retrospective study included 465 patients who had undergone vitreoretinal surgery. The reasons, incidence, and timing of treatment plan changes within 14 days of surgery were identified. Potential factors associated with the changes, such as patient demographics, surgeon’s experience, diagnoses, and type of surgery were also analyzed. Results The treatment plan was changed in 76 patients (16.3%) at a mean of 4.0 ± 3.2 days after vitreoretinal surgery. The reasons for the plan changes were increased intraocular pressure (IIOP) in 66(86.8%), intraocular inflammation in 2(2.6%), corneal edema in 3(3.9%), leakage from the sclerotomy wound in 3(3.9%) patients, and combined IIOP and intraocular inflammation in 2(2.6%). The date of discharge was postponed because of treatment plan changes in 17 patients (22.4%). The incidence of plan changes was higher in patients who underwent gas or oil tamponade (P < 0.001) and those who underwent surgery performed by less experienced surgeons (P = 0.034). Conclusions Treatment plan was changed in 16.3% of patients after vitreoretinal surgery. The risk of treatment plan changes was associated with the surgeon’s experience in vitreoretinal surgery and the type of surgery. These results should be considered when establishing standardized care plans for patients who require vitreoretinal surgery.

show abstract

Expansile gas concentration in primary pseudophakic retinal detachment repair, effect on intraocular pressure and outcomes; the Manchester Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Study

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

Sf6 Compared With C2f6 for Inferior Rhegmatogenous Retinal Repair

Sf6 Compared With C2f6 for Inferior Rhegmatogenous Retinal Repair

Incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes after vitreoretinal surgery: a single-center study in South Korea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About