2015
DOI: 10.1038/nature16038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the role of diagnostic and prognostic tools for infectious diseases in resource-poor settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When designing new diagnostic tests, the level of the healthcare system where a test will be deployed is an important consideration. Ghani et al have identified five healthcare system levels, with different types of diagnostic or prognostic tools suitable for different levels 31. Typhoid is most prevalent in LMIC with limited healthcare resources, and in these contexts the optimal typhoid test would not require sophisticated equipment and could be easily interpreted by non-laboratory personnel 6 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing new diagnostic tests, the level of the healthcare system where a test will be deployed is an important consideration. Ghani et al have identified five healthcare system levels, with different types of diagnostic or prognostic tools suitable for different levels 31. Typhoid is most prevalent in LMIC with limited healthcare resources, and in these contexts the optimal typhoid test would not require sophisticated equipment and could be easily interpreted by non-laboratory personnel 6 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed a convenient means of external quality assurance by working with countries to generate thermally stable proficiency panels that can be shipped to every POC testing site to ensure competence of testing personnel. However, a study in South Africa found that only 3% of HIV RDTs were performed correctly 15 . Although not every error will result in an incorrect diagnosis, the alarming reality is that with 150 million tests being performed annually worldwide, assuming a 99% accuracy rate, as many as 1.5 million incorrect results per year could potentially be generated.…”
Section: Assured Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuring the quality of tests and testing is the biggest challenge when testing is decentralized at POC. There are many rapid tests from various manufacturers available, and test quality may impact accurate and inconsistent diagnosis across different sites, with studies showing that high rates of errors were observed even in performance of simple RDTs for HIV and malaria 15,68 . Quality of testing requires proficiency panels be sent to all the POC testing sites by a national reference laboratory.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Successful Assured Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a wider initiative lead by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), the WHO, and the Foundation of Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), the parameters of a multi-pathogen and multi-analyte diagnostic platform (MAPDx) to support improved diagnostic capacity at level 2 or above [21,22] were defined. This work aimed to prioritize common fever-causing pathogens to inform pathogens for use on a fever-specific diagnostic cartridge for diagnosis in LMICs using a two-pronged approach combining a) currently available scientific data incorporated into an analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and b) systematically gathered expert input to compensate for the paucity of regional and global pathogen-specific data availability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%