2021
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2021.1917029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding Student Success: The Impact of a Comprehensive College Transition Program on Psychosocial Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, advisors could ask students about their relationships with faculty and other students during academic advising sessions, and universities could use semesterly surveys to identify students in the bottom quartile of belonging or academic self-efficacy. Improving students' feelings of BMSE is possible, particularly when students receive comprehensive support from an intensive, asset-based, and individualized intervention (e.g., Melguizo et al, 2021). More work is needed to understand how campus-wide interventions and assessment of BMSE levels are related to student outcomes and BMSE growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, advisors could ask students about their relationships with faculty and other students during academic advising sessions, and universities could use semesterly surveys to identify students in the bottom quartile of belonging or academic self-efficacy. Improving students' feelings of BMSE is possible, particularly when students receive comprehensive support from an intensive, asset-based, and individualized intervention (e.g., Melguizo et al, 2021). More work is needed to understand how campus-wide interventions and assessment of BMSE levels are related to student outcomes and BMSE growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each campus, portions of applicants to this program were randomly assigned to three conditions: (a) the CCTP treatment condition, in which the participants received financial assistance and a comprehensive set of supports (e.g., academic classes, and first-year seminars); (b) the college opportunity scholars (COS) condition, where the participants received financial assistance only; and (c) the control condition, where participants received neither financial aid nor the CCTP (Angrist et al, 2016). Melguizo et al (2021) compared the participants in the CCTP condition to those in the COS condition and demonstrated that the CCTP participants experienced substantial gains in two psychosocial outcomes: sense of belonging to a campus community and mattering to a campus community. The former is defined as the perception that one is a part of the broader campus community (Hausmann et al, 2007;Hurtado et al, 2008;Chang et al, 2011;Strayhorn, 2012).…”
Section: A Running Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article uses data based on a longitudinal study registered with the American Economic Association (Identifier AEARCTR-0000125). The article is related to Melguizo et al (2021)…”
Section: Author's Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar statement was reported by Fong et al [18], who suggested that CBE was conducted successfully in Kuching, Malaysia, and it improved the community members' selfefficacy, together with their sustainability of the tourism industry in their area. The significance of selfefficacy in the context of CBE was also reported to positively affect leadership skills [19], motivation to learn [20], and academic success among students [21]. It is also important to note that self-efficacy is significantly connected to hope, spirituality, and the sense of mattering [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%