Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1111/ajpy.12141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding schema conceptualisation and assessment: Towards a richer understanding of adaptive and maladaptive functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifications indices suggested that some schemas should directly (and not indirectly via automatic thoughts) predict assertive behavior and social anxiety; no pathway was suggested between assertive behavior and social anxiety. This direct impact of schemas in affect and behavior is in line with the theorization of schemas in relation to both adaptive and maladaptive functioning (Steffen, Elliot, Lassen, Olsen, & Smith, 2016). Hence, those modification indices were included in the model.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modellingsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Modifications indices suggested that some schemas should directly (and not indirectly via automatic thoughts) predict assertive behavior and social anxiety; no pathway was suggested between assertive behavior and social anxiety. This direct impact of schemas in affect and behavior is in line with the theorization of schemas in relation to both adaptive and maladaptive functioning (Steffen, Elliot, Lassen, Olsen, & Smith, 2016). Hence, those modification indices were included in the model.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modellingsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although the present study focused on self-schema content, future studies should examine self-schema content and organization and employ indirect self-schema measures (e.g., psychological distance scaling task [PDST; Dozois and Dobson 2001;youth version Lumley et al 2012], self-referent encoding task [SRET; Kuiper and Derry 1982]), and determine whether these facets of self-schemas similarly or differentially predict youths' functioning. Finally, future studies ought to consider gradations of selfschemas (i.e., moderate vs. extreme) given the presence of extreme positive cognitions may not necessarily incite adaptive outcomes (Gruman et al 2017;Steffen et al 2016;Vazquez 2017).…”
Section: Future Directions and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although research suggests that negative affect is a distinct entity from positive affect, positive affect may buffer the effects of negative affect (Fredrickson & Levenson, 1998; Fredrickson et al, 2000). Moreover, research indicates that the employment of multiple cognitive regulation strategies, or cognitive flexibility, may be more protective against psychopathology than effectively engaging in only one strategy (Davis & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000; Fredrickson, 2004; Steffen, Elliott, Lassen, Olsen, & Smith, 2016), suggesting that it is important to understand which strategies co-occur and whether there may be specific combinations of strategies that promote mental health. Thus, examining trait affect and affective regulation styles in concert will allow us to better understand their interplay and how they manifest within individuals.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%