Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) Augmentation of Deep Nasolabial Creases

Robertson, Kevin M.; Dyer, Wallace K.

doi:10.1001/archotol.125.4.456

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Approximately, 10% of patients developed a transient erythema, possibly secondary to "superficial placement" of the grafts. In 1999, Robertson and Dyer 16 reported their experience with carved Gore-Tex implants for the correction of prominent nasolabial folds. In their group, 2.5% of patients developed an infection at the implant site (Staphylococcus aureus).…”

Section: Commentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Satisfaction With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) Implants to the Perioral Region

Wall

Adamson²,

Bailey³

et al. 2003

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To assess clinical results in patients undergoing implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) for perioral enhancement (melolabial fold, melomental fold, upper lip, and lower lip). Design: Fifty patients had undergone Softform implantation by a single surgeon. A retrospective telephone survey (25 questions) was conducted. Of 50 patients, 38 (76%) were contacted. The mean interval between the procedure and survey was 22.7 months (range, 2-40 months). Responses were submitted for statistical analysis. A pathological review was performed on specimens removed from 2 patients. Results: Two patients (4%) developed postoperative infections that resolved with use of oral antibiotics; 5 patients (10%) requested repositioning owing to dissatisfaction with placement; and 5 patients (10%) requested implant removal. Composite scores indicated that patients were "slightly" satisfied with the procedure outcome. Of the 38 patients contacted, 24 (63%) would undergo additional implants and 20 (53%) would recommend the procedure to others. Results were not significantly influenced by site, size, or history of prior augmentation procedures. Histologic review indicated that implants elicit a chronic inflammatory reaction and that blood vessels infiltrate the porous walls of the implant. Conclusion: With proper patient selection, Softform represents a potential option for those individuals considering perioral enhancement.

show abstract

Section: Commentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Satisfaction With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) Implants to the Perioral Region

Wall

Adamson²,

Bailey³

et al. 2003

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additional disadvantages of this material included a 5% infection rate and occasionally and unnatural moundlike appearance. 30 SoftForm ® is a tubular length of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene contained in a closed trocar delivery system. Its pore size ranges from 0.5 to 30 m, which allows for tissue fixations without the disadvantage of true tissue ingrowth.…”

Section: Gore-tex ® and Softform ®mentioning

confidence: 99%

Tissue Matrices for Soft Tissue and Mucosal Augmentation and Replacement

Ward¹,

Feinberg²,

Friedman³

2002

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facial plastic surgery frequently involves the replacement or augmentation of facial soft tissue and mucosal surfaces. Material and technique advancements in this area are frequent. Surgeons must remain knowledgeable to provide patients with services that best meet individual needs. We review the concepts that guide this decision process and discuss a variety of materials: old, new, and investigational. A greater understanding of the options available, with their inherent risks and benefits, increases the surgeon's ability to communicate and guide patients in their decision-making process. New materials will continue to be developed and play a role as the search for the optimal replacement of soft tissue and mucosa continues.

show abstract

“…The proper review of reports on GORE-TEX as a nasal implant must include a number of factors. A review of the literature [18][19][20][21]27,[29][30][31] suggests that many accompanying clinical circumstances contribute to its successful retention by the tissues. They include applied surgical methods, particular attention to the sterility and handling of the implant, and the choice of patients.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Applications of GORE-TEX Implants in Rhinoplasty Reexamined After 17 Years

Conrad

Torgerson

Gillman

2008

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) Augmentation of Deep Nasolabial Creases

Abstract: Expanded PTFE augmentation presents a safe, effective method for softening deep nasolabial creases. Patients with more severe creases are likely to show more improvement with each augmentation, but are also more likely to require multiple procedures to achieve the desired aesthetic result.

Cited by 12 publications

References 32 publications

Patient Satisfaction With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) Implants to the Perioral Region

Patient Satisfaction With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Softform) Implants to the Perioral Region

Tissue Matrices for Soft Tissue and Mucosal Augmentation and Replacement

Applications of GORE-TEX Implants in Rhinoplasty Reexamined After 17 Years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About