2020
DOI: 10.21105/joss.02281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ExoTiC-ISM: A Python package for marginalised exoplanet transit parameters across a grid of systematic instrument models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the analytic transit light curve model, we use batman [34] with a quadratic limb darkening law. We use ExoTiC-LD [55][56][57], with 3D stellar models [38] to determine the appropriate coefficients, adopting the stellar parameters (T eff = 5512 ± 55 K, log g = 4.47 ± 0.03 cgs, [Fe/H] = 0.01 ± 0.09 dex) from [43] and Gaia DR3 [58,59]. For our final fits, we fix the quadratic coefficient, u 2 , to the values determined by ExoTiC-LD.…”
Section: Tiberiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the analytic transit light curve model, we use batman [34] with a quadratic limb darkening law. We use ExoTiC-LD [55][56][57], with 3D stellar models [38] to determine the appropriate coefficients, adopting the stellar parameters (T eff = 5512 ± 55 K, log g = 4.47 ± 0.03 cgs, [Fe/H] = 0.01 ± 0.09 dex) from [43] and Gaia DR3 [58,59]. For our final fits, we fix the quadratic coefficient, u 2 , to the values determined by ExoTiC-LD.…”
Section: Tiberiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48] (https://eurekadocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), and Tiberius [16,53,54] . In addition, these made use of Exoplanet [45] (https://docs.exoplanet.codes/en/latest/), Pymc3 [79] (https://docs.pymc.io/en/v3/index.html), ExoTEP [49−−51] , Batman [34] (http://lkreidberg.github.io/batman/docs/html/index.html), ExoTiC-ISM [55] (https://github.com/Exo-TiC/ExoTiC-ISM), ExoTiC-LD [57] (https://exotic-ld.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), Emcee [33] (https://emcee.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), Dynesty [71] (https://dynesty.readthedocs.io/en/stable/index.html), and chromatic (https://zkbt.github.io/chromatic/), which use the python libraries scipy [80] , numpy [81] , astropy [82,83] , and matplotlib [84] . The atmospheric models used to fit the data can be found at PICASO [62−−65] (https://natashabatalha.github.io/picaso/), Virga85 (https://natashabatalha.github.io/virga/), ScCHIMERA [60,61] (https://github.com/mrline/CHIMERA), ATMO [67,68] , and PHOENIX [69,70].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analytic transit light curve model, we use batman 33 with a quadratic limb darkening law. We use ExoTiC-LD 55,56 , with 3D stellar models 39 to determine the appropriate coefficients, adopting the stellar parameters (T eff = 5512±55K, logg = 4.47±0.03 cgs, [Fe/H] = 0.01±0.09 dex) from 34 and Gaia DR3 57,58 . For our final fits, we fix the quadratic coefficient, u 2 , to the values determined by ExoTiC-LD.…”
Section: Tiberiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fit the HST light curves and correct them for systematic effects from the telescope and instruments, we use the systematic instrument marginalisation method outlined in Wakeford et al (2016). For our WFC3/G102 and G141 light curves, we use the ExoTiC-ISM python package developed by Laginja & Wakeford (2020). ExoTiC-ISM uses a Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares minimisation over a grid of 50 systematic models 5 to obtain a set of fitted transit parameters for each model, making use of the resulting Akaike Information Criterion (AIC, Akaike 1974) to calculate each model's evidence and weight.…”
Section: Hubblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis made use of components of the IDL Astronomy Users Library (Landsman 1995) and the Python packages: NumPy (Oliphant 2006), SciPy (Virtanen et al 2019), MatPlotLib (Caswell et al 2019) (Buchner et al 2014b). This research made use of ExoTiC-ISM (Laginja & Wakeford 2020), a software package for marginalised transit parameters, which was developed based on the work by Wakeford et al (2016).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%