2021
DOI: 10.1108/qmr-07-2020-0094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exiting fieldwork “with grace”: reflections on the unintended consequences of participant observation and researcher-participant relationships

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the methodological importance of how researchers exit fieldwork to draw attention to implications for participant and researcher well-being. Design/methodology/approach Reflecting in detail on one researcher’s final six-months exiting fieldwork at a retirement village, this paper critically examines the unintended consequences of participant observation and researcher-participant relationships. Findings The paper illustrates that difficulties to exit field… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the project involved several years of dialogue between ourselves and local government officers, neighbourhood teams and local elected members from MCC. In engaged scholarship, these partnerships can often be rekindled (Barbour et al , 2017), contrasting with the need to carefully create “exit plans” in traditional participant–researcher studies (Franco and Yang, 2021). The construction of ongoing relationships with external partners not only helped to mitigate any initial distrust but also meant MCC and the academic team were well-placed to successfully bid for European funding to extend the existing work by several years.…”
Section: Partnership Workingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the project involved several years of dialogue between ourselves and local government officers, neighbourhood teams and local elected members from MCC. In engaged scholarship, these partnerships can often be rekindled (Barbour et al , 2017), contrasting with the need to carefully create “exit plans” in traditional participant–researcher studies (Franco and Yang, 2021). The construction of ongoing relationships with external partners not only helped to mitigate any initial distrust but also meant MCC and the academic team were well-placed to successfully bid for European funding to extend the existing work by several years.…”
Section: Partnership Workingmentioning
confidence: 99%