Waterborne Pathogens 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-59543-0.00003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existing Methods of Waterborne Pathogen Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total coliforms include bacterial species of fecal origin, as well as other bacterial groups that commonly occur in the soil. Moreover, the persistence in water, the relationship between fecal indicator bacteria and the occurrence of diseases may not be accurate in all the locations of sampling and environmental settings [ 9 , 10 , 55 , 56 ]. Additionally, indicators may be severely underrepresented when injured by disinfectants used in water treatment processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total coliforms include bacterial species of fecal origin, as well as other bacterial groups that commonly occur in the soil. Moreover, the persistence in water, the relationship between fecal indicator bacteria and the occurrence of diseases may not be accurate in all the locations of sampling and environmental settings [ 9 , 10 , 55 , 56 ]. Additionally, indicators may be severely underrepresented when injured by disinfectants used in water treatment processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requisite condition to generate positive DEP force is that the media should be less polarizable than the particle ( 56 ). Cell culture media, which typically have a high conductivity and are more polarizable than mammalian cells, are not suitable for positive DEP-induced cell trapping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Previously, cell culture-based techniques used to be considered the best standard for the detection of different types of viruses [71]. Nonetheless, the qPCR and RT-qPCR became the most prevalent detection methods for waterborne and other viruses [73,74]. The shift towards such techniques is mainly attributed to the reduced time it takes to perform these assays, their high specificity and sensitivity, and the ability of these assays to detect viruses that cannot easily be cultured in the laboratory.…”
Section: Dna/rna Extraction and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%